Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Dec;8(12):2569-79.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02440.x. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study

C E Freise et al. Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Patients considering living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) need to know the risk and severity of complications compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). One aim of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) was to examine recipient complications following these procedures. Medical records of DDLT or LDLT recipients who had a living donor evaluated at the nine A2ALL centers between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. Among 384 LDLT and 216 DDLT, at least one complication occurred after 82.8% of LDLT and 78.2% of DDLT (p = 0.17). There was a median of two complications after DDLT and three after LDLT. Complications that occurred at a higher rate (p < 0.05) after LDLT included biliary leak (31.8% vs. 10.2%), unplanned reexploration (26.2% vs. 17.1%), hepatic artery thrombosis (6.5% vs. 2.3%) and portal vein thrombosis (2.9% vs. 0.0%). There were more complications leading to retransplantation or death (Clavien grade 4) after LDLT versus DDLT (15.9% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.023). Many complications occurred more commonly during early center experience; the odds of grade 4 complications were more than two-fold higher when centers had performed <or=20 LDLT (vs. >40). In summary, complication rates were higher after LDLT versus DDLT, but declined with center experience to levels comparable to DDLT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Strong RW. Living-donor liver transplantation: An overview. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:370–377. - PubMed
    1. Humar A. Donor and recipient outcomes after adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:S42–44. - PubMed
    1. Pomposelli JJ, Verbesey J, Simpson MA, et al. Improved survival after live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) using right lobe grafts: Program experience and lesson learned. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:589–598. - PubMed
    1. Maluf DG, Stravitz RT, Cotterell AH, et al. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: A 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:149–156. - PubMed
    1. Ho MC, Wu YM, Hu RH, et al. Surgical complications and outcome of living related liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:2249–2251. - PubMed

Publication types