Understanding routine antiepileptic drug decisions: a qualitative analysis of patients' accounts of hospital consultations
- PMID: 18977312
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.10.010
Understanding routine antiepileptic drug decisions: a qualitative analysis of patients' accounts of hospital consultations
Abstract
Objective: We sought to understand how antiepileptic drug (AED) decisions, similar to those that occur in observational studies on AEDs, were made between doctors and patients in the hospital clinic. We could find no previous research that focused specifically on understanding AED decision making in epilepsy.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with patients who carried a secure diagnosis of epilepsy and who had recently attended a follow-up appointment with a consultant with a special interest in epilepsy. Interviews were digitally recorded and professionally transcribed. A "grounded theory" approach was used for analysis; the Nvivo (QRS release 2.0) computer package was used to manage the data effectively and transparently. No new important themes emerged by the final 10 transcripts, suggesting theoretical data saturation had been reached.
Results: Five major themes emerged: preappointment treatment considerations; preconsultation feelings and hopes; acceptance of prognosis and disillusionment; hypothetical change; and decisional ownership. Our interviewees appeared highly susceptible to the doctor's suggestions. All those with active epilepsy and seizures that impacted their life appeared happy to follow the doctor's advice-whatever that may be. This highlights both the desperation many patients have to be free of epilepsy and also the doctor's authority; the perceived authority of the doctor seemed to explain why even patients who were seizure free said they would follow the advice to change treatment, were it suggested.
Conclusion: Our findings describe decision making from the patients' perspective and support a dominant role for the doctor in the decision making process. There may be factors specific to intractable epilepsy that may be disempowering to involvement in decision making. However, whether patients wish for greater involvement in decision making remains unanswered as stated by one patient "But you're there to take their [the doctor's] advice, that's what you go for don't you?".
Similar articles
-
Quantifying the response to antiepileptic drugs: effect of past treatment history.Neurology. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):54-65. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000286959.22040.6e. Neurology. 2008. PMID: 18166707
-
Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions.Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Nov 26. Patient Educ Couns. 2011. PMID: 21112174
-
Patient perception of generic antiepileptic drugs in the Midwestern United States.Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Jan;14(1):150-3. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Epilepsy Behav. 2009. PMID: 18845274
-
When to start drug treatment for childhood epilepsy: the clinical-epidemiological evidence.Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009 Mar;13(2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Jun 24. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009. PMID: 18567515 Review.
-
Seizure disorders.Med Clin North Am. 2009 Mar;93(2):343-51, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.10.001. Med Clin North Am. 2009. PMID: 19272512 Review.
Cited by
-
Generating the perception of choice: the remarkable malleability of option-listing.Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Sep;40(7):1250-1267. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12766. Epub 2018 Aug 3. Sociol Health Illn. 2018. PMID: 30076628 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical