Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee classified as noncopers may be candidates for nonsurgical rehabilitation
- PMID: 18979658
- PMCID: PMC2801138
- DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2750
Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee classified as noncopers may be candidates for nonsurgical rehabilitation
Abstract
Study design: Prospective cohort study.
Objectives: First, to classify a group of individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee as potential copers or potential noncopers, based on an established screening examination. Second, to prospectively follow a cohort of individuals with an ACL injury and characterize the nonoperatively treated subjects as true copers and true noncopers 1 year after injury, and evaluate the outcomes in operatively treated individuals 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Finally, to calculate the predictive value of the screening examination based on a 1-year follow-up of the group of subjects with ACL tears treated nonoperatively.
Background: A screening examination has been developed for early classification of individuals with ACL injuries. Potential copers have successfully been identified as rehabilitation candidates and have shown that they are able to continue preinjury activities without ACL reconstruction (true copers). However, the potential of individuals identified as noncopers to become true copers has not been studied.
Methods and measures: One hundred and twenty-five subjects with ACL injury were evaluated using a screening examination consisting of 4 single-legged hop tests, the Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living scale, the global rating of knee function, and the numbers of episodes of giving way. Knee laxity measurements, the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form (IKDC2000), and return to sport were included as outcome measurements.
Results: Thirty-seven percent (n = 46) of the subjects with ACL injury were classified as potential copers at the screening examination. Of the 102 subjects examined at follow-up, 51% (n = 52) had undergone nonoperative treatment. Sixty-five percent (n = 34) of the nonoperated subjects were classified as true copers at the 1 year follow-up. Among the potential copers, 60% were true copers, while 70% of the subjects initially classified as potential noncopers were true copers at the 1 year follow-up. The positive predictive value for correctly classifying true copers at the screening examination was 60% (95% confidence interval: 41%-78%), while the negative predictive value was 30% (95% confidence interval: 16%-49%).
Conclusion: A majority (70%) of subjects classified as potential noncopers were true copers after 1 year of nonoperative treatment. Individuals with nonoperative treatment and ACL reconstruction showed excellent knee function and were highly active at the 1 year follow-up. The prognostic accuracy of this screening examination for correctly classifying true copers was poor.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Feb;31(2):210-5. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199902000-00002. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999. PMID: 10063808
-
Identifying individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee as copers and noncopers: a narrative literature review.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Oct;41(10):758-66. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3384. Epub 2011 Sep 30. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011. PMID: 21979555 Review.
-
Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;43(11):821-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4514. Epub 2013 Sep 9. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013. PMID: 24175594 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament-deficient potential copers and noncopers reveal different isokinetic quadriceps strength profiles in the early stage after injury.Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):586-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349492. Epub 2010 Jan 28. Am J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20110458 Free PMC article.
-
Early Operative Versus Delayed or Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Pediatric Patients.J Athl Train. 2016 May;51(5):425-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050.51.5.11. Epub 2016 May 31. J Athl Train. 2016. PMID: 27244126 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2509-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458424. Epub 2012 Sep 7. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22962290 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction versus Nonoperative Treatment: Better Function and Less Secondary Meniscectomies But No Difference in Knee Osteoarthritis-A Meta-Analysis.Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1658S-1670S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211046041. Cartilage. 2021. PMID: 34929763 Free PMC article.
-
The Voluntary Response Index in Electromyographic Study During Landing Test of the Patients With ACL Deficiency: A New Study Protocol.Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 May;16(5):e14119. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.14119. Epub 2014 May 5. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014. PMID: 25031855 Free PMC article.
-
Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.Clin Sports Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Clin Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25818715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Return to Preinjury Sport After ACL Injury Treated Without Reconstruction: NACOX Cohort Study 12-Month Follow-up.Sports Health. 2023 Mar-Apr;15(2):176-184. doi: 10.1177/19417381221094780. Epub 2022 May 27. Sports Health. 2023. PMID: 35633030 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alkjaerl Simonsen EB, Jorgensen U, Dyhre-Poulsen R. Evaluation of the walking pattern in two types of patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency; copers and non-copers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003. pp. 301–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0787-x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson AF, irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form; normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006. pp. 128–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546505280214. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Andersson C, Odensten M, Gillquist J. Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991:255–263. - PubMed
-
- Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports. Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004. pp. 350–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S00167-004-0518-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barrance PJ, Williams GN, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. Altered knee kinematics in ACL-deficient non-copers: a comparison using dynamic MRI. J Orthop Res. 2006. pp. 132–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.20016. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical