Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul 7;2(1):79-85.
doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.013.2008. eCollection 2008 Jul.

Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies

Affiliations

Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies

Tim Shallice et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

This paper considers evidence provided by large neuropsychological group studies and meta-analyses of functional imaging experiments on the location in frontal cortex of the subprocesses involved in the carrying out of task-switching paradigms. The function of the individual subprocesses is also considered in the light of analyses of the performance of normal subjects.

Keywords: anterior attentional system; errors; focal lesions; frontal lobes; reaction time; review; switch-cost; task-switching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The experimental paradigm used in Shallice et al. (2008b). It is derived from the paradigm developed by Meiran (1996).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The conceptual framework of the paper based on the Supervisory System framework (Shallice and Burgess, ; Stuss et al., 1995). The inner green boxes and yellow arrows represent on-line processes which (following learning) would be realised in contention scheduling. The outer blue boxes and arrows represent supervisory control processes. These include (in the early stages of learning) task rules operating as explicit if-then contingencies. The four patient groups discussed – left lateral, right lateral, superior medial and inferior medial – are held to have impairments in different supervisory processes.

References

    1. Alexander M. P., Stuss D. T., Picton T. W., Shallice T., Gillingham S. (2007). Regional frontal injuries cause distinct impairments in cognitive control. Neurology 68, 1515–152310.1212/01.wnl.0000261482.99569.fb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander M. P., Stuss D. T., Shallice T., Picton T. W., Gillingham S. (2005). Impaired concentration due to frontal lobe damage from two distinct lesion sites. Neurology 65, 572–57910.1212/01.wnl.0000172912.07640.92 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allport D. A., Styles E. A., Hsieh S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Attention and Performance, Vol. XV, Umilta C., Moscovitch M., eds (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press; ), pp. 421–452
    1. Allport D. A., Wylie G. (2000). “Task-switching”, stimuli-response bindings, and negative priming. In Attention and Performance, Vol. XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes, Monsell S., Driver J. S., eds (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press; ), pp. 35–70
    1. Altmann E. M. (2005). Repetition priming in task switching: do the benefits dissipate? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 535–540 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources