Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;17(6):665-73.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0521-2. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs

Affiliations

The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs

Nisar Ahmed et al. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Goals of work: The authors describe the use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a new supportive and palliative care screening measure to identify the specialist supportive and palliative care needs of patients with an advanced illness.

Materials and methods: A draft screening measure was developed by literature reviewing and consultation with patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Using this draft, cognitive interviews were conducted with six professionals and one consumer using the 'thinking aloud technique' to assess the perception, usefulness and interpretation of each question on the measure. The focus of these interviews was to identify unclear words or phrases and to explore how the questions worked in eliciting a response. A content analysis of the interviews was used to identify problems with the text, phrasing and format of the questions and accompanying responses.

Main results: The authors found the technique to be useful in identifying jargon or confusing questions. A number of perspectives were taken into account by speaking to health and social care professionals in primary care and secondary care who would be offering the measure to future patients.

Conclusions: The most sensitive questions were highlighted, and this enabled the researchers to consider how these should be asked and responded to in subsequent versions of the measure. The measure was re-drafted in light of these comments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Res Nurs Health. 2007 Apr;30(2):224-34 - PubMed
    1. Ment Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;5(4):209-21 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Educ. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):1006-17 - PubMed
    1. Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):87-93 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12 (3):229-38 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources