Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Sep;53(3):89-92.
doi: 10.4038/cmj.v53i3.248.

Management of acute paracetamol poisoning in a tertiary care hospital

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Management of acute paracetamol poisoning in a tertiary care hospital

S M D K G Senarathna et al. Ceylon Med J. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the management of acute paracetamol poisoning with the best evidence available, and to determine the effect of plasma paracetamol level estimation on the management.

Design: Descriptive study with an intervention.

Setting: Medical wards of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo.

Patients: Patients admitted with a history of acute paracetamol poisoning.

Intervention: Measurement of plasma paracetamol.

Methods: Data were obtained from the patients, medical staff and medical records. Plasma paracetamol was estimated between 4-24 hours of paracetamol ingestion. The current management practices were compared with the best evidence on acute paracetamol poisoning management.

Results: 157 patients were included. The mean ingested dose of paracetamol was 333 mg/kg body weight. Majority of the patients (84%) were transfers. Induced emesis and activated charcoal were given to 91% of patients. N-acetylcysteine was given to 66, methionine to 55, and both to 2. Aclinically important delay in the administration of antidotes was noted; 68% of patients received antidotes after 8 hours of the acute ingestion. Only 31 (26%) had paracetamol levels above the Rumack-Matthew normogram. 74 patients received an antidote despite having a plasma paracetamol level below the toxic level according to the normogram.

Interpretation: Management of acute paracetamol poisoning could be improved by following best available evidence and adapting cheaper methods for plasma paracetamol estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Buckley N, Eddelston M. Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) poisoning. Clinical evidence. 2006 http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb.
    1. Fernando R. Management of poisoning. National Poison Information Centre, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, State Printing Corporation; Sri Lanka: 1998.
    1. Bond GR, Novak JE. The human and economic cost of paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;8:177–81. - PubMed
    1. Sheen CI, Dillon JF, Bateman DN, Simpson KJ, MacDonald TM. Paracetamol toxicity: epidemiology, prevention and costs to the health-care system. International Journal of Medicine. 2002;95:609–19. - PubMed
    1. Sood SP, Green VI. Routine methods in toxicology and therapeutic drug monitoring by high-performance liquid chromatography. Rapid method for determination of acetaminophen in plasma, including a STAT procedure. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 1987;9:248–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms