Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;3(3):413-20.
doi: 10.2147/cia.s1825.

Mild cognitive impairment: conceptual, assessment, ethical, and social issues

Affiliations
Review

Mild cognitive impairment: conceptual, assessment, ethical, and social issues

Perla Werner et al. Clin Interv Aging. 2008.

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as a condition characterized by newly acquired cognitive decline to an extent that is beyond that expected for age or educational background, yet not causing significant functional impairment. The concept of MCI has received considerable attention in the literature over the past few years, and aspects related to its definition, prevalence, and evolution have been extensively studied and reviewed. Here we attempt to synthesize the implications of the current status of this entity, focusing on the conceptual, methodological, and, in particular, the social and ethical aspects of MCI which have attracted less attention. We discuss the weaknesses of the concept of MCI, which is heterogeneous in etiology, manifestations, and outcomes, and suggest that the emergence of the syndrome at this stage reflects industrial interests related to possible development of drugs for this disorder. On the other hand, the formal diagnosis of MCI, with its implications that the person may develop dementia, may have a grave impact on the psychological state of the individual, at a stage when prediction of outcome is tenuous and possibilities of useful interventions are meager. We present suggestions for the direction of future research in these areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aharonson V, Korczyn AD. Human-computer interaction in the administration and analysis of neuropsychological tests. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;73:43–53. - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer’s Society of Canada. Stigma and Alzheimer’s disease media kit: Public opinion poll summary. [Online] 2003. [Accessed March 19, 2003]. URL: http://www.alzheimer.ca/english/media/stigma03-poll.htm.
    1. Andrews DG, Kinsella G, Murphy M. Using a memory handbook to improve everyday memory in community-dwelling older adults with memory complaints. Exp Aging Res. 1996;22:305–22. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin C, Hughes J, Hope T, et al. Ethics and dementia: Mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18:41–54. - PubMed
    1. Beeri M, Werner P, Davidson M, et al. The cost of Alzheimer’s disease in Israel. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002;16:73–80. - PubMed