Right hemispheric dominance for echo suppression
- PMID: 18983863
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.022
Right hemispheric dominance for echo suppression
Abstract
When two sounds are presented sequentially within a short delay ( approximately 10ms), the listener perceives a single auditory event, the location of which is dominated by the directional information conveyed by the leading sound (the precedence effect, PE). The PE is not always instantaneous, but has been shown to build-up across repetitions of lead-lag pairs. Here, we investigated the contributions of lateralization cue (interaural time and intensity differences; ITD and IID, respectively) and the side of lateralization of the leading sound on the spatio-temporal activity associated with the PE. We applied electrical neuroimaging analyses to compare auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in response to physically identical click pairs presented early and late within a stimulus train and perceived as two segregated events or as one fused auditory event. Significant topographic AEP modulations associated with the PE were observed over the 70-117ms post-stimulus period, with one topography characterizing fused perceptions and another segregated perceptions. The specific pattern of effects varied as a function of lateralization cue and the lateralization of the leading sound. The PE for ITD stimuli built-up during the stimulus train irrespective of the lateralization of the leading sound. The PE for IID stimuli did not exhibit build-up over the course of the stimulus train, but instead was generally affected by the lateralization of the leading sound. Source estimations further suggested that bilateral temporal networks were engaged when perceptions were segregated, whereas fused perceptions resulted in decreased activity in left temporal and increased activity in right temporo-parietal cortices.
Similar articles
-
The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.Brain Res. 2006 May 30;1092(1):161-76. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.095. Epub 2006 May 8. Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16684510
-
Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: an ERP mapping study.Neuroimage. 2002 May;16(1):76-88. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1062. Neuroimage. 2002. PMID: 11969319 Clinical Trial.
-
Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.Hear Res. 2005 Jul;205(1-2):157-71. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.014. Hear Res. 2005. PMID: 15953525
-
A perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man.Hear Res. 2008 Apr;238(1-2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Oct 1. Hear Res. 2008. PMID: 17980984 Review.
-
A detection-theoretic model of echo inhibition.Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):52-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.52. Psychol Rev. 2004. PMID: 14756585 Review.
Cited by
-
Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):301-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3514518. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 21303011 Free PMC article.
-
Local inhibition of GABA affects precedence effect in the inferior colliculus.Neural Regen Res. 2014 Feb 15;9(4):420-9. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.128250. Neural Regen Res. 2014. PMID: 25206830 Free PMC article.
-
The precedence effect and its buildup and breakdown in ferrets and humans.J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1406-18. doi: 10.1121/1.4864486. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014. PMID: 24606278 Free PMC article.
-
Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.J Neurophysiol. 2012 Oct;108(7):1869-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00175.2012. Epub 2012 Jul 11. J Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22786953 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial attention modulates the precedence effect.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1371-9. doi: 10.1037/a0028348. Epub 2012 Apr 30. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012. PMID: 22545599 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources