Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Nov-Dec;4(6):368-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2008.08.002.

Hitting the target: why existing measures of "religiousness" are really reverse-scored measures of "secularism"

Daniel E Hall  1 , Harold G Koenig, Keith G Meador
Affiliations
Review

Hitting the target: why existing measures of "religiousness" are really reverse-scored measures of "secularism"

Daniel E Hall et al. Explore (NY). 2008 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Over 100 measures of religiousness and spirituality are used in research investigating the associations between religion and health. These measures are often used to assess "religiousness in general," but this approach lumps together widely divergent worldviews in ways that can distort religion beyond recognition. The authors suggest that the existing measures of religiousness are perhaps better understood as reverse-coded measures of "secularism." This argument suggests that the existing data regarding religiousness and health might be best interpreted as demonstrating a small, robust health liability associated with a deliberately secular worldview. If true, this conclusion might change the direction of future research, and it would imply that meaningful inferences about the health associations of religious practice will depend on developing tools that measure specific religions in their particularity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Religiousness-in-General
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
The Religious Landscape Note: The shape and contour of these traditions are arbitrarily chosen, and they were not derived in any systematic way (e.g. this in not in any way analogous to multidimensional scaling). However, the diagram is drawn to suggest that within the broadly construed binary construct of secularism and religiousness, there are multiple independent traditions, sometime overlapping, sometimes independent.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Hitting the Target
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
A Measure of Secularism
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hill PC, Hood R Jr, eds. Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press; 1999.
    1. Sloan RP, Bagiella E. Claims about religious involvement and health outcomes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002;24(1):14–21. - PubMed
    1. Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA. Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years. American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87(6):957–961. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCullough ME, Pargament KI, Thoresen C, eds. Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2000.
    1. Idler EL, Kasl SV. Religion among disabled and nondisabled persons II: attendance at religious services as a predictor of the course of disability. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences. 1997;52(6):S306–316. - PubMed

Publication types