Comparison of perceived and quantitative measures of occupational noise exposure
- PMID: 18984805
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/men071
Comparison of perceived and quantitative measures of occupational noise exposure
Abstract
Objectives: Characterization of highly variable noise exposures over long periods of time presents a major challenge. Common exposure assessment strategies such as assignment of exposure levels based on job title information may not provide adequate exposure contrast or precision for variable exposures. Subjective exposure data may offer an alternative or complementary exposure assessment strategy. This study evaluated the relationship between perceived and quantitatively measured exposure.
Methods: Twenty subjects were recruited at each of three worksites with different noise environments (continuous, intermittent and highly variable). Full-shift quantitative measurements (n = 206) were made on each subject during four workshifts over 2 weeks. Perceived exposure data were collected via surveys on subjects' first (n = 58) and last (n = 57) monitored shifts, as well as through timeline logs completed by subjects during each monitored shift. The first survey focused on the first shift only, while the second survey covered the whole 2-week period.
Results: Timeline log data suggested that subjects could differentiate between different noise levels and degrees of noise variability. Survey items on perceived exposure variability and impulsiveness performed well at the continuous and highly variable sites. Analyses of contrast between exposure grouping strategies showed that job title generally did not produce statistically distinct exposure groups and that several survey items provided greater contrast than job title. The precision of exposures predicted from survey items was comparable to, or slightly better than, that of job title for several survey items, and the addition of survey items to prediction models which included job title improved model fit and precision.
Conclusions: Supplemental perceived noise exposure information appears to offer promise for improving exposure estimates, particularly for individuals with highly variable exposures.
Similar articles
-
Agreement between task-based estimates of the full-shift noise exposure and the full-shift noise dosimetry.Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Apr;53(3):201-14. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep010. Epub 2009 Mar 12. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009. PMID: 19282390
-
Mixed models and empirical bayes estimation for retrospective exposure assessment of dust exposures in Canadian sawmills.Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Apr;50(3):281-8. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mei076. Epub 2006 Jan 30. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006. PMID: 16446305
-
Comparison of task-based estimates with full-shift measurements of noise exposure.AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003 Nov-Dec;64(6):823-9. doi: 10.1202/524.1. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003. PMID: 14674795
-
Combined chemical, physical hazards make exposures harder to calculate. Studies show multiple exposures must be evaluated wholly rather than 'adding up' individual risks.Occup Health Saf. 1994 Jun;63(6):50, 52, 54. Occup Health Saf. 1994. PMID: 15662858 Review.
-
Comparison between occupational noise measurement strategies: why is it important?Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2971-3. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0551-2971. Work. 2012. PMID: 22317172 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Noise Exposure and Risk of Hearing Loss for Young People in Amusement Arcades.Noise Health. 2024 Jul-Sep 01;26(122):338-345. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_59_23. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Noise Health. 2024. PMID: 39345074 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations.Am J Ind Med. 2018 Jun;61(6):477-491. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22833. Epub 2018 Mar 14. Am J Ind Med. 2018. PMID: 29537072 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 May;8(5):310-23. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.568832. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011. PMID: 21491323 Free PMC article.
-
Working in preschool increases the risk of hearing-related symptoms: a cohort study among Swedish women.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Nov;92(8):1179-1190. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01453-0. Epub 2019 Jul 8. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 31286224 Free PMC article.
-
The dose-response relationship between in-ear occupational noise exposure and hearing loss.Occup Environ Med. 2013 Oct;70(10):716-21. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100455. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Occup Environ Med. 2013. PMID: 23825197 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical