Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;55(1):52-8.
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.107391. Epub 2008 Nov 6.

Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice

Affiliations

Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice

Alan H B Wu et al. Clin Chem. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The improved detection limit and precision in new-generation commercial assays for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) have lowered the 99th-percentile cutoff value, yielding higher frequencies of positive test results. Because serial testing is important in interpreting low concentrations, we evaluated the biological variation of cTnI in both the short (hours) and long (weeks) terms and determined reference change values (RCVs) and the index of individuality (II) for cTnI.

Methods: To assess short- and long-term variation, we collected blood from 12 healthy volunteers hourly for 4 h and from 17 healthy individuals once every other week for 8 weeks, measured cTnI with a high-sensitivity assay (detection limit, 0.2 ng/L), and computed analytical, intraindividual, interindividual, and total CVs (CV(A), CV(I), CV(G), and CV(T), respectively; CV(T) = CV(A) + CV(I) + CV(G)) as well as the II. Because of the slight right-skewness of the data, RCVs were calculated with a lognormal approach.

Results: Within-day CV(A), CV(I), and CV(G) values were 8.3%, 9.7%, and 57%, respectively; the corresponding between-day values were 15%, 14%, and 63%. Within- and between-day IIs were 0.21 and 0.39, respectively. Lognormal within-day RCVs were 46% and -32%, respectively; the corresponding between-day values were 81% and -45%.

Conclusions: The low II indicates that population-based reference intervals are less useful for interpreting cTnI values than following serial changes in values in individual patients. This criterion is particularly important for interpreting results from patients who show cTnI increases at low concentrations measured with very high-sensitivity assays, from patients presenting with chest pain (short term), and for evaluating drugs for cardiotoxicity (long term).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types