Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;10(1):22-32.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0111-z.

Pathways from parental knowledge and warmth to adolescent marijuana use: an extension to the theory of planned behavior

Andrew Lac  1 , Eusebio M Alvaro, William D Crano, Jason T Siegel
Affiliations

Pathways from parental knowledge and warmth to adolescent marijuana use: an extension to the theory of planned behavior

Andrew Lac et al. Prev Sci. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Despite research indicating that effective parenting plays an important protective role in adolescent risk behaviors, few studies have applied theory to examine this link with marijuana use, especially with national data. In the current study (N = 2,141), we hypothesized that parental knowledge (of adolescent activities and whereabouts) and parental warmth are antecedents of adolescents' marijuana beliefs-attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control-as posited by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB; Ajzen 1991). These three types of beliefs were hypothesized to predict marijuana intention, which in turn was hypothesized to predict marijuana consumption. Results of confirmatory factor analyses corroborated the psychometric properties of the two-factor parenting structure as well as the five-factor structure of the TPB. Further, the proposed integrative predictive framework, estimated with a latent structural equation model, was largely supported. Parental knowledge inversely predicted pro-marijuana attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control; parental warmth inversely predicted pro-marijuana attitudes and subjective norms, ps < .001. Marijuana intention (p < .001), but not perceived behavioral control, predicted marijuana use 1 year later. In households with high parental knowledge, parental warmth also was perceived to be high (r = .54, p < .001). Owing to the analysis of nationally representative data, results are generalizable to the United States population of adolescents 12-18 years of age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Confirmatory factor analysis of parental knowledge and warmth Note. All paths are statistically significant, p < .001. Paths represent standardized coefficients. E = error.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Confirmatory factor analysis of Theory of Planned Behavior constructs Note. All paths are statistically significant, p < .001. Paths represent standardized coefficients. E = error.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Parental knowledge and warmth predicting Theory of Planned Behavior constructs Note. Solid paths are statistically significant, ps < .001. Paths represent standardized coefficients. D = disturbance. For clarity, not displayed are factor loadings of the latent factors; and correlations among the disturbance terms of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, ps < .001.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton-Keynes, England: Open University Press; 1988.
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. - DOI
    1. Ajzen I, Cote NG. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior. In: Crano WD, Prislin R, editors. Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology; 2008. pp. 289–311.
    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.
    1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1986;22:453–474. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4. - DOI

Publication types