Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov 6:5:23.
doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-23.

By invitation only - the case for breast cancer screening reminders for women over 69 years

Affiliations

By invitation only - the case for breast cancer screening reminders for women over 69 years

Carla Saunders et al. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women in Australia. Early detection provides the best chance of reducing mortality and morbidity from the disease. Mammographic screening is a population health strategy for the early detection of breast cancer in Australia. Recruitment strategies such as regular advertising and biannual screening invitations are exclusively targeted at women aged 50 - 69 years. Even though they can participate, women 70 years or over are not invited or actively encouraged to undertake screening. Research has found that a routine letter of invitation increases the number of women participating in breast cancer screening.

Methods: Cancer data analysis and a literature and policy review was conducted to assess age specific breast cancer mortality rates and the legitimacy of rationale used to limit invitations for breast cancer screening to women younger than 70 years.

Results: The proportion of women over 69 years participating in the BreastScreen program is significantly less than rate of screening in the target age range (50-69 years). Evidence and data indicate that common justifications for limiting screening reminders to the target age range including life expectancy, comorbidities, effectiveness, treatment and cost are, for many women, unreasonable.

Conclusion: There is now sufficient data to support a change in the targeted upper age range for breast cancer screening to improve the existing suboptimal surveillance in women aged over 69 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A comparison of death rates from female breast cancer in 2005 with BreastScreen participation rates in 2004–5. Data source: Ref [3] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2008. BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2004–2005. Cancer series no. 42. Cat. no. CAN 37.

Similar articles

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & National Breast Cancer Centre 2006 . Cancer series no 34 cat no CAN 29. Canberra: AIHW; Breast cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006.http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/can/bca06/bca06.pdf
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2008 . Cancer series no 42 Cat no CAN 37. Canberra: AIHW; BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2004–2005.http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/can/bsamr04-05/bsamr04-05.pdf
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics 3303.0 – Causes of Death, Australia, 2006 Latest ISSUE 14/03/2008 http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/2093DA6935DB138FCA2568A9001393C9
    1. World Health Organization . The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. WHO, Geneva; 2000.
    1. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006. http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001877.html Art No. CD001877. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub2 Date of last substantive update: July 12. 2006. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources