Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry
- PMID: 18991034
- DOI: 10.1007/s10384-008-0535-9
Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal power (CCP), and axial length (AL) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry, and the effects of CCP and AL on CCT.
Methods: Charts of 147 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative examinations for cataract surgery between April 2006 and April 2007 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. CCT, CCP, and AL were measured by ultrasonic pachymeter (Micropach Model 200P, Sonomed, Lake Success, N.Y. USA), autorefractokeratometer (KR 8800, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), and ultrasound biometry (EZ Scan AB 5500+ Sonomed, Lake Success, N.Y. USA). Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used as indicated, and only one eye of each subject was included in the statistical analysis.
Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients were included in the study. IOP and CCT were significantly and positively correlated (P<0.001), and CCT and CCP (P=0.001) were inversely correlated. Multiple regression analysis showed that the effect of CCT on IOP was statistically significant (P<0.001), but the effects of CCP and AL on IOP were not significant (P=0.614, P=0.831, respectively). IOP increased by 0.29 mmHg for each 10 microm increase in CCT.
Conclusions: CCT, but not CCP or AL, significantly affected IOP readings obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The effect of CCP on IOP was weak and not significant despite the significant inverse correlation between CCT and CCP.
Similar articles
-
Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry.Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;124(4):471-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.4.471. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16606871 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.J Glaucoma. 2007 Oct-Nov;16(7):581-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180640f40. J Glaucoma. 2007. PMID: 18091174
-
Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17070592
-
Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar-Apr;44(5):367-408. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000. PMID: 10734239 Review.
-
[Clinical key points. Intraocular pressure].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 May;30(5 Pt 2):3S35-8. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007. PMID: 17646799 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Effect of biometric characteristics on biomechanical properties of the cornea in cataract patient.Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 18;9(6):854-7. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.06.11. eCollection 2016. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27366687 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann tonometry: a retrospective study.Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;42(1):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02021-7. Epub 2021 Sep 23. Int Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34554360
-
Utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry for monitoring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0192344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192344. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29401477 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous