Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):224-9; discussion 229-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

Selection of electrical algorithms to treat obesity with intermittent vagal block using an implantable medical device

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Selection of electrical algorithms to treat obesity with intermittent vagal block using an implantable medical device

Michael Camilleri et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background: A laparoscopically implantable electrical device that intermittently blocks both vagi near the esophagogastric junction led to significant excess weight loss (EWL) in an initial clinical trial in obese patients. The study objective was to optimize therapy algorithms and determine the EWL achieved with a second-generation device at university hospitals in Australia, Norway, and Switzerland.

Methods: Data acquired during the initial clinical trial were analyzed and subsequently used to select alternative electrical algorithms. In the second trial, vagal blocking using one selected therapy algorithm was initiated 2 weeks after implanting the second-generation device. The patients were followed up for 6 months to assess the EWL and safety, including adverse events.

Results: In the initial clinical trial, vagal blocking algorithm durations of 90-150 s were associated with greater EWL compared with either shorter or longer algorithm durations (P<.01). The second trial enrolled 27 patients (mean body mass index 39.3+/-.8 kg/m2) to evaluate a 120-s blocking algorithm. At 6 months, greater EWL was achieved (22.7%+/-3.1%, n=24) compared with the initial study and first-generation device (14.2%+/-2.2%, n=29, P=.03). In both trials, an association was found between the number of 90-150-s algorithms delivered daily and greater EWL (P=.03). No deaths, unanticipated device-related adverse events, or medically serious adverse events were associated with the device.

Conclusion: This second-generation vagal blocking device, using a therapy algorithm of 120-s duration, resulted in a clinically acceptable safety profile and significantly greater EWL compared with the first-generation device delivering a wider range of therapy algorithm durations.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms