Supporting the design of translational clinical studies through the generation and verification of conceptual knowledge-anchored hypotheses
- PMID: 18998958
- PMCID: PMC2656058
Supporting the design of translational clinical studies through the generation and verification of conceptual knowledge-anchored hypotheses
Abstract
The ability to generate hypotheses based upon the contents of large-scale, heterogeneous data sets is critical to the design of translational clinical studies. In previous reports, we have described the application of a conceptual knowledge engineering technique, known as constructive induction (CI) in order to satisfy such needs. However, one of the major limitations of this method is the need to engage multiple subject matter experts to verify potential hypotheses generated using CI. In this manuscript, we describe an alternative verification technique that leverages published biomedical literature abstracts. Our report will be framed in the context of an ongoing project to generate hypotheses related to the contents of a translational research data repository maintained by the CLL Research Consortium. Such hypotheses will are intended to inform the design of prospective clinical studies that can elucidate the relationships that may exist between biomarkers and patient phenotypes.
Figures
References
-
- Zerhouni EA. US biomedical research: basic, translational, and clinical sciences. Jama. 2005;294(11):1352–8. - PubMed
-
- Sung NS, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Jama. 2003;289(10):1278–87. - PubMed
-
- Payne PR, et al. Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research. J Investig Med. 2005;53(4):192–200. - PubMed
-
- Kipps TJ. Immunobiology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2003;10(4):312–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical