Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists
- PMID: 19001403
- DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111
Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists
Abstract
It is increasingly easy and, therefore, increasingly common to conduct experiments and questionnaire studies in online environments. However, the online environment is not a data collection medium that is familiar to many researchers or to many research methods instructors. Because of this, researchers have received little information about how to address ethical issues when conducting online research. Researchers need practical suggestions on how to translate federal and professional ethics codes into this new data collection medium. This article assists United States psychologists in designing online studies that meet accepted standards for informed consent, deception, debriefing, the right to withdraw, security of test materials, copyright of participants' materials, confidentiality and anonymity, and avoiding harm.
Similar articles
-
Ethical issues surrounding human participants research using the Internet.Ethics Behav. 2003;13(3):211-9. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1303_01. Ethics Behav. 2003. PMID: 14680001
-
Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.Ethics Behav. 2003;13(1):45-60. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1301_08. Ethics Behav. 2003. PMID: 14552304
-
Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: a discussion paper.Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Oct 5. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009. PMID: 18838135 Review.
-
Online survey tools: ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Jun;4(2):37-48. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19480590 Review.
-
Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities.Qual Health Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):124-34. doi: 10.1177/1049732303259842. Qual Health Res. 2004. PMID: 14725180
Cited by
-
Are all "research fields" equal? Rethinking practice for the use of data from crowdsourcing market places.Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1333-1342. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0789-y. Behav Res Methods. 2017. PMID: 27515317 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics of Online Assent: Comparing Strategies to Ensure Informed Assent Among Youth.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624809. Epub 2016 Feb 28. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26928895 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development and validation of a Social Images Evaluation Questionnaire for youth in residential care.PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179890. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28662056 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized study of two different consent procedures on recall: a study within a digital alcohol intervention trial.Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07855-3. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38167493 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
How should debriefing be undertaken in web-based studies? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 16;14(6):e157. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2186. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 23160103 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.