Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Nov 18;99(10):1572-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604759. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

Relationship between effects on time-to-disease progression and overall survival in studies of metastatic breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

Relationship between effects on time-to-disease progression and overall survival in studies of metastatic breast cancer

B Sherrill et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

The relationship between overall survival (OS) and disease progression end points has been demonstrated in colorectal, colon, and non-small cell lung cancers. We assessed the association between OS and time-to-progression (TTP) or progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) studies. A literature search retrieved all randomised controlled trials since 1994 in patients with MBC in which OS and either TTP or PFS were reported. Summary data on trial and patient characteristics were abstracted. Study effect sizes were derived as the ratio of median progression (or survival) times, which approximates the hazard ratio. Effects were centred at zero for regression analyses weighted by sample size. Numerous treatments were represented in 67 studies (17 081 patients). Modeling showed a positive association between outcomes for progression and survival (R(2)=0.30) with a slope of 0.32 (P<0.001) and a non-significant intercept. Thus, a treatment effect on TTP/PFS translated into a concordant effect on OS, but with attenuated effect size. Similar results were found in models of subsets and sensitivity analyses. These results demonstrate that treatment effects on progression end points in MBC trials are expected to result in treatment differences on OS that are smaller yet consistently in the same direction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot of HR for survival vs HR for progression by study size regression line: EffectOS=0.32 × EffectTTP where Effect is the HR centred at unity. Bubbles show relative sample sizes from each study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bruzzi P, Del Mastro L, Sormani MP, Bastholt L, Danova M, Focan C, Fountzilas G, Paul J, Rosso R, Venturini M (2005) Objective response to chemotherapy as a potential surrogate end point of survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23: 5117–5125 - PubMed
    1. Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Sledge G, Carmichael J, Luck HJ, Mackey JR, Nabholtz JM, Paridaens R, Biganzoli L, Jassem J, Bontenbal M, Bonneterre J, Chan S, Basaran GA, Therasse P (2008) Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 1987–1992 - PubMed
    1. Buyse M, Burzykowski T, Carroll K, Michiels S, Sargent DJ, Miller LL, Elfring GL, Pignon JP, Piedbois P (2007) Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 5218–5224 - PubMed
    1. Eiermann W (2001) Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: pivotal trial data. Ann Oncol 12(Suppl 1): S57–S62 - PubMed
    1. Hackshaw A, Knight A, Barrett-Lee P, Leonard R (2005) Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93: 1215–1221 - PMC - PubMed