Evaluation of e-textbooks. DynaMed, MD Consult and UpToDate
- PMID: 19002313
Evaluation of e-textbooks. DynaMed, MD Consult and UpToDate
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the acceptability and utilisation of three electronic textbooks: DynaMed, MD Consult (including FirstConsult) and UpToDate.
Method: Two hundred general practitioners accessed three e-textbooks through a web portal. General practitioners completed an electronic survey and used a random selection during a telephone interview to answer four clinical questions: screening, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
Results: One hundred and twenty-two GPs made at least one hit through the study website. Eighty-four GPs completed the emailed questionnaire and 77 completed the telephone interview (36% of enrolled, 61% of users). Fifty-one percent of users accessed the e-textbooks less than 10 times over 8 months. There was no significant difference in preference for, or usage levels of, the three e-textbooks. During the telephone interview the three texts performed similarly in terms of time to answer and satisfaction with answer.
Conclusion: There was no clear 'winner' between the three e-textbooks.
Similar articles
-
Learning radiology a survey investigating radiology resident use of textbooks, journals, and the internet.Acad Radiol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.002. Acad Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17707320
-
A comparison of answer retrieval through four evidence-based textbooks (ACP PIER, Essential Evidence Plus, First Consult, and UpToDate): a randomized controlled trial.Med Teach. 2011;33(9):724-30. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.531155. Med Teach. 2011. PMID: 21854150 Clinical Trial.
-
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Mar 15. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16632141 Clinical Trial.
-
Educational resources: website and book review.Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62 Suppl 1:103-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05311.x. Anaesthesia. 2007. PMID: 17937725 Review.
-
Inconsistencies in surface anatomy: The need for an evidence-based reappraisal.Clin Anat. 2010 Nov;23(8):922-30. doi: 10.1002/ca.21044. Clin Anat. 2010. PMID: 20830790 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Use of DynaMed and UpToDate by Physician Trainees in Clinical Decision-Making: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):139-147. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742216. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Appl Clin Inform. 2022. PMID: 35108739 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Type of evidence behind point-of-care clinical information products: a bibliometric analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 18;13(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1539. J Med Internet Res. 2011. PMID: 21335319 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacist perception and use of UpToDate®.J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Oct;102(4):296-300. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014. PMID: 25349549 Free PMC article.
-
OrthoEvidence™: A Clinical Resource for Evidence-Based Orthopedics.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015 Jun 3;7(2):5762. doi: 10.4081/or.2015.5762. eCollection 2015 Jun 3. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015. PMID: 26330990 Free PMC article.
-
Developing and using a rubric for evaluating evidence-based medicine point-of-care tools.J Med Libr Assoc. 2011 Jul;99(3):247-54. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011. PMID: 21753917 Free PMC article.