Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;56(2):123-36.
doi: 10.1007/s10616-008-9135-2. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

Development of a generic transient transfection process at 100 L scale

Affiliations

Development of a generic transient transfection process at 100 L scale

Ola Tuvesson et al. Cytotechnology. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

We have developed a generic transient transfection process at 100 L scale, using HEK293-EBNA cells and PEI as the transfection reagent for the production of recombinant IgG. The process, including large-scale plasmid preparation, expression at bioreactor scale, capture, purification and, if necessary, endotoxin removal allows reproducible production of more than 0.5 g IgG for in vitro and in vivo studies. We compared the performance of two HEK cell lines, investigated the effect of conditioned medium, optimized the DNA:PEI ratio and implemented a feed strategy to prolong the culture time to increase product yield. The transient transfection protocol developed enables a closed process from seeding culture to protein capture. The challenge of performing a medium exchange before transfection at large scale is solved by applying a continuous centrifugation step between the seeding bioreactor and the production bioreactor. After 7-8 days the harvest and capture is performed in a one-step operation using a Streamline expanded bed chromatography system. Following a polishing step the purified antibody is transferred to the final formulation buffer. The method has shown to be reproducible at 10, 50, and 100 L scale expressing between 5 and 8 mg L(-1) IgG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Influence of conditioned medium on transient protein expression. Cells were seeded in culture medium at a density of 0.5 × 10cells mL−1 with five different ratios of 72-h-old conditioned medium. The experiment was performed in 30 mL shaked cultures with pCEP4-AmCyan as expression vector. AmCyan expression was measured 24, 48 and 72 h post transfection using the signal-to-noise assay. Data (RFU) of one representative experiment are presented (░24 h, ▒48 h, □72 h)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Influence of the time of transfection on transient protein expression. Cells were seeded in Wave bags at a density of 0,5 × 10cells mL−1. Samples of 30 mL were taken almost every hour, transferred to a shaker or spinner flask and immediately transfected with a freshly prepared transfection complex using pCEP4-AmCyan. AmCyan expression was followed with the signal-to-noise assay for 3 days. Data of one representative experiment (Wave—shake flasks) are presented (░48 h, ▒72 h)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Transfection of a 10 L HEK293-EBNA cells culture in a Wave Bioreactor. In two experiments (open symbols experiment 1, closed symbols experiment 2) cells were seeded in Wave bags at a density of 1 × 10cells mL−1. Two hours later the cultures were transfected and after an additional 4 h incubation, the cultures were fed to the final culture volume. IgG concentration (○●) was determined by ELISA and the viable cell concentration (△▲) and viability (□■) were assessed using a Cedex automatic cell counter
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Transfection of 50 L HEK293-EBNA cells cultured in a 50 L (a) and 100 L (b) stirred tank bioreactor. In two experiments (open symbols experiment 1, closed symbols experiment 2) cells were seeded from a seeding bioreactor at a density of 1 × 10cells mL−1. Two hours later the cultures were transfected and after an additional 4 h the cultures were fed to the final culture volume. IgG concentrations (○●) were determined by ELISA and the viable cell concentration (△▲) and viability (□■) were assessed using a Cedex automatic cell counter. (c) Shows the glucose (□■), lactate (△▲) and glutamine (○●) concentration monitored for the two 100 L cultures
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of the average cell specific productivities at 10, 50 and 100 L production scale. The average cell specific productivities were calculated over the whole production process as ((ΔIgG Δtime−1 ΔCv−1) × 24 h). The error bars show the standard deviation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Transient transfection working scheme for transfections in 50 and 100 L bioreactors. The key-events from cell thawing to the final product formulation are indicated

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.026', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.026'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17046339', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17046339/'}]}
    2. Abhinav A, Shukla A, Hubbard B, Tressel T et al (2007) Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies—Application of platform approaches. J Chromatogr 848:28–39 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1021/bp049830x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1021/bp049830x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15903252', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15903252/'}]}
    2. Baldi L, Muller N, Picasso S et al (2005) Transient gene expression in suspension HEK-293 cells: application to large-scale protein production. Biotechnol Prog 21:148–153 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1074/jbc.274.27.19375', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.27.19375'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10383450', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10383450/'}]}
    2. Belting M, Petersson P (1999) Intracellular accumulation of secreted proteoglycans inhibits cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer. Co-transfer of glycosaminoglycans to the nucleus. J Biol Chem 274(27):19375–19382 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.004', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.004'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15722161', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15722161/'}]}
    2. Belting M, Sandgren S, Wittrup A (2005) Nuclear delivery of macromolecules: barriers and carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57(4):505–527 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16082021', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16082021/'}]}
    2. Birch J, Onakunle Y (2005) Biopharmaceutical proteins: opportunities and challenges. In: Smales CM, James DC (eds) Therapeutic proteins: methods and protocols. Totowa, Humana Press, pp 1–16 - PubMed