A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
- PMID: 19003704
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160802393017
A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
Abstract
Because of the important benefits that biomedical research offers to humans, some have argued that people have a general moral obligation to participate in research. Although the defense of such a putative moral duty has raised controversy, few scholars, on either side of the debate, have attended to the social context in which research takes place and where such an obligation will be discharged. By reflecting on the social context in which a presumed duty to participate in research will obtain, this article shows that decontextualized discussions of this putative moral obligation are problematic.
Comment in
-
Response to open peer commentaries on "A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?".Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160802519462. Am J Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19003693 No abstract available.
-
In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research.Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):37-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802478594. Am J Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19003705 No abstract available.
-
Correcting social ills through mandatory research participation.Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):39-40. doi: 10.1080/15265160802478545. Am J Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19003706 No abstract available.
-
Participation in research and social context: the case of population-based cancer registration, surveillance, and research.Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):41-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802478446. Am J Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19003707 No abstract available.
-
Research participation and internal normativity: understanding why people participate.Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):43-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513184. Am J Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19003708 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources