Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jan;47(1):215-6.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01338-08. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

Evaluation of the rapid BioStar optical immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent women

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the rapid BioStar optical immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent women

Claudiu I Bandea et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the BioStar Chlamydia OIA (optical immunoassay) in adolescent females (n = 261) from an inner city population. With a reference standard of two different nucleic acid amplification tests, the sensitivity and specificity of the BioStar Chlamydia OIA were 59.4 and 98.4%, respectively. Due to its relatively low sensitivity, the BioStar Chlamydia OIA should only be used in conjunction with more sensitive laboratory tests unless laboratory tests are unavailable or timely return for treatment is unlikely.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Black, C. M. 1997. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10160-184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black, C. M., J. Marrazzo, R. E. Johnson, E. W. Hook III, R. B. Jones, T. A. Green, J. Schachter, W. E. Stamm, G. Bolan, M. E. St. Louis, and D. H. Martin. 2002. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 403757-3763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gift, T. L., M. S. Pate, E. W. Hook 3rd, and W. J. Kassler. 1999. The rapid test paradox: when fewer cases detected lead to more cases treated: a decision analysis of tests for Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 26232-240. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. 1997. The hidden epidemic: confronting sexually transmitted diseases. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
    1. Koumans, E. H., C. M. Black, L. E. Markowitz, E. Unger, A. Pierce, M. K. Sawyer, and J. R. Papp. 2003. Comparison of methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests and a liquid pap smear medium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1507-1511. - PMC - PubMed