Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Mar;23(3):449-56.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.325. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma

A Palumbo et al. Leukemia. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

The introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma (MM). In patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), combinations including thalidomide/dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) or bortezomib/dexamethasone (Bort/Dex) or lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) have been introduced as induction regimens in patients eligible for ASCT. New induction regimens have significantly increased complete response rate before and after ASCT with a positive impact on progression-free survival. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide, under investigation with lenalidomide, may further prolong remission duration. In patients not eligible for ASCT, randomized studies have shown that melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) and melphalan, prednisone and bortezomib (MPV) are both superior to melphalan and prednisone (MP), and are now considered standard of care. Ongoing trials will soon assess if MP plus lenalidomide may be considered an attractive option. More complex regimens combining thalidomide or bortezomib or lenalidomide with cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin have been also tested. In small cohorts of patients bortezomib or lenalidomide may overcome the poor prognosis induced by deletion 13 or translocation t(4;14) or deletion 17p13. If these data will be confirmed, a cytogenetically risk-adapted strategy might become the most appropriate strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

SVR has received research support to cover cost of clinical trials at Mayo Clinic from Celgene Corporation. AP has received scientific advisory-board and lecture fees from Pharmion, Celgene and Janssen-Cilag. Also supported by CA 62242, CA107476, CA 100080 and CA 93842 to SVR; Università degli Studi di Torino; Compagnia di S Paolo, MIUR and CNR to AP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1860–1873. - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1371–1382. - PubMed
    1. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Linet M, Tamra T, Young JL, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2000. National Cancer Institute; [Accessed on 7 September 2004]. Available at: http//seer.cancer.gov//csr/1975_2001.
    1. Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kurtin PJ, Hodnefield JM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2582–2590. - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Dingli D, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, et al. Outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in patients with preceding plasma cell disorders. Br J Haematol. 2008;141:205–211. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms