Prognosis of large, symptomatic pericardial effusion treated by echo-guided percutaneous pericardiocentesis
- PMID: 19006110
- PMCID: PMC6653504
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.20305
Prognosis of large, symptomatic pericardial effusion treated by echo-guided percutaneous pericardiocentesis
Abstract
Backgrounds: The causes and prognosis of pericardial effusion (PE) may be different according to time, region, economy, and hospital. This study was performed to evaluate the etiology, clinical outcome, and prognosis of patients with large, symptomatic PE treated by echo-guided pericardiocentesis at Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital (the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea).
Hypothesis: According to etiologies of large, symptomatic PE, the prognosis of patients may be different.
Methods: We reviewed 116 consecutive patients who underwent echo-guided pericardiocentesis due to large, symptomatic PE over the last 12 y. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve with log-rank method was applied for the survival analysis.
Results: Procedural success rate of echo-guided pericardiocentesis was 99.1%. Common causes of PE requiring pericardiocentesis were lung cancer (27.6%), tuberculosis (TB) (13.8%), and uremia (6.9%). The mortality rate of 6 mo after the pericardiocentesis was 80.3% in malignant PE, whereas the over-all mortality rate was 18.2% in nonmalignant PE (p < 0.0001). Among the malignant PE, lung cancer (27.6%) and breast cancers (6.9%) were the most common causes. The mean cytologic detection rate and mean life expectancy of malignant PE were 44% and 5-7 mo. Patients with breast cancer and lymphoma had relatively better life expectancy (11.4 and 7.7 mo), whereas those with stomach cancer and metastases of unknown origin (MUO) had poorer prognosis (1.2 and 2.3 mo). The most common causes of nonmalignant PE were TB, uremia, and iatrogenic, and their mean life expectancy was approximately 54 mo.
Conclusions: Malignancy, especially lung cancer and TB, were the most common causes of large symptomatic PE. The prognosis of large symptomatic PE was related to the underlying disease. Malignant PE was associated with the poorest prognosis.
Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 8;66(10):1119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26337990 Free PMC article.
-
Echo-guided pericardiocentesis in patients with clinically significant pericardial effusion. Outcomes over a 10-year period.Herz. 2015 Apr;40 Suppl 2:153-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-014-4187-x. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Herz. 2015. PMID: 25491665
-
Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of pericardial effusion in patients who underwent echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: Yonsei Cardiovascular Center experience, 1993-2003.Yonsei Med J. 2004 Jun 30;45(3):462-8. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.3.462. Yonsei Med J. 2004. PMID: 15227733
-
Role of echocardiography in the treatment of cardiac tamponade.Echocardiography. 2014 Aug;31(7):899-910. doi: 10.1111/echo.12605. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Echocardiography. 2014. PMID: 24697811 Review.
-
Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan-Feb;59(4):380-388. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017. PMID: 28062268 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and Efficacy of Echo- vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Pericardiocentesis in Cardiac Tamponade.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 4;61(2):265. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020265. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40005382 Free PMC article.
-
Pericardiocentesis: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1377-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02134-2. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39276266 Review.
-
Causes and prognosis of symptomatic pericardial effusions treated by pericardiocentesis in an Asian academic medical centre.Singapore Med J. 2020 Mar;61(3):137-141. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019065. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Singapore Med J. 2020. PMID: 32488274 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Patients with and without Malignancy Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Nov 6;8(11):150. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8110150. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021. PMID: 34821703 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, Predictors, and Clinical Presentation of Acute Pericardial Effusion Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 11;8:759164. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.759164. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. Retraction in: Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 08;11:1425882. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1425882. PMID: 35087880 Free PMC article. Retracted.
References
-
- Tsang TS, Enriquez‐Sarano M, Freeman WK, Barnes ME, Sinak LJ, et al.: Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 429–436. - PubMed
-
- Mercé J, Sagristà‐Sauleda J, Permanyer‐Miralda G, Soler‐Soler J: Should pericardial drainage be performed routinely in patients who have a large pericardial effusion without tamponade? Am J Med 1998; 105: 106–109. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical