Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2008 Nov;57(11):731-4.

Glucose self-monitoring: think twice for type 2 patients

Affiliations
Comment

Glucose self-monitoring: think twice for type 2 patients

Michael D Mendoza et al. J Fam Pract. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

For patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, self-monitoring may do more harm than good

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. O’Kane MJ, Bunting B, Copeland M, Coates VE. ESMON study group Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336:1174–1177.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Home PD, et al. Clinical guidelines and evidence review for Type 2 diabetes: management of blood glucose. 2002. Scharr, University of Sheffield. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/NICE_full_blood_glucose.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2008.
    1. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee Canadian Diabetes Association 2003 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2003;27(suppl 2):S18–S23.. - PubMed
    1. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry. Am J Med. 2001;111:1–9.. - PubMed
    1. Sarol JN Jr, Nicodemus NA Jr, Tan KM, Grava MB. Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of a multi-component therapy among non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis (1966-2004). Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:173–184.. - PubMed