Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Fall;24(4):390-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00186.x.

Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients

Laura-Mae Baldwin  1 , Yong Cai, Eric H Larson, Sharon A Dobie, George E Wright, David C Goodman, Barbara Matthews, L Gary Hart
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients

Laura-Mae Baldwin et al. J Rural Health. 2008 Fall.

Abstract

Context: Cancer care requires specialty surgical and medical resources that are less likely to be found in rural areas.

Purpose: To examine the travel patterns and distances of rural and urban colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to 3 types of specialty cancer care services--surgery, medical oncology consultation, and radiation oncology consultation.

Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry and Medicare claims data for 27,143 individuals ages 66 and older diagnosed with stages I through III CRC between 1992 and 1996.

Findings: Over 90% of rural CRC patients lived within 30 miles of a surgical hospital offering CRC surgery, but less than 50% of CRC patients living in small and isolated small rural areas had a medical or radiation oncologist within 30 miles. Rural CRC patients who traveled outside their geographic areas for their cancer care often went great distances. The median distance traveled by rural cancer patients who traveled to urban cancer care providers was 47.8 miles or more. A substantial proportion (between 19.4% and 26.0%) of all rural patients bypassed their closest medical and radiation oncology services by at least 30 miles.

Conclusions: Rural CRC patients often travel long distances for their CRC care, with potential associated burdens of time, cost, and discomfort. Better understanding of whether this travel investment is paid off in improved quality of care would help rural cancer patients, most of whom are elderly, make informed decisions about how to use their resources during their cancer treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dor A, Holahan J. Urban-rural differences in Medicare physician expenditures. Inquiry. 1990;27(4):307–318. - PubMed
    1. Virnig BA, Moscovice IS, Durham SB, Casey MM. Do rural elders have limited access to Medicare hospice services? J AmGeriatr Soc. 2004;52(5):731–735. - PubMed
    1. Hart LG, Salsberg E, Phillips DM, Lishner DM. Rural health care providers in the United States. J RuralHealth. 2002;18 Suppl:211–232. - PubMed
    1. Kresl JJ, Drummond RL. A historical perspective of the radiation oncology workforce and ongoing initiatives to impact recruitment and retention. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(1):8–14. - PubMed
    1. Tropman SE, Ricketts TC, Paskett E, Hatzell TA, Cooper MR, Aldrich T. Rural breast cancer treatment: evidence from the Reaching Communities for Cancer Care (REACH) project. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;56(1):59–66. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms