Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008:2008:704343.
doi: 10.1155/2008/704343. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

Reconstructive surgery for severe penile inadequacy: phalloplasty with a free radial forearm flap or a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap

Affiliations

Reconstructive surgery for severe penile inadequacy: phalloplasty with a free radial forearm flap or a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap

N Lumen et al. Adv Urol. 2008.

Abstract

Objectives. Severe penile inadequacy in adolescents is rare. Phallic reconstruction to treat this devastating condition is a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Phallic reconstruction using the free radial forearm flap (RFF) or the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) has been routinely used in female-to-male transsexuals. Recently we started to use these techniques in the treatment of severe penile inadequacy. Methods. Eleven males (age 15 to 42 years) were treated with a phallic reconstruction. The RFF is our method of choice; the ALTF is an alternative when a free flap is contraindicated or less desired by the patient. The RFF was used in 7 patients, the ALTF in 4 patients. Mean followup was 25 months (range: 4-49 months). Aesthetic and functional results were evaluated. Results. There were no complications related to the flap. Aesthetic results were judged as "good" in 9 patients and "moderate" in 2 patients. Sensitivity in the RFF was superior compared to the ALTF. Four patients developed urinary complications (stricture and/or fistula). Six patients underwent erectile implant surgery. In 2 patients the erectile implant had to be removed due to infection or erosion. Conclusion. In case of severe penile inadequacy due to whatever condition, a phalloplasty is the preferred treatment nowadays. The free radial forearm flap is still the method of choice. The anterolateral thigh flap can be a good alternative, especially when free flaps are contraindicated, but sensitivity is markedly inferior in these flaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incorporation of residual penile tissue at the base of the phallus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The radial forearm free flap using the tube-in-a-tube principle for creation of the neourethra.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The anterolateral thigh flap. (a) Preoperative: the vascular pedicle is marked at the middle using Doppler-ultrasound. (b) Postoperative.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Excellent aesthetic appearence after RFF (a)-(b) and ALTF (c) phalloplasty.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reiner WG, Gearhart JP. Discordant sexual identity in some genetic males with cloacal exstrophy assigned to female sex at birth. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(4):333–341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang TS, Hwang WY. Forearm flap in one-stage reconstruction of the penis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984;74(2):251–258. - PubMed
    1. Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Dhont M, et al. Radial forearm phalloplasty: a review of 81 cases. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2005;28(3):206–212.
    1. Gilbert DA, Horton CE, Terzis JK, Devine CJ, Jr., Winslow BH, Devine PC. New concepts in phallic reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1987;18(2):128–136. - PubMed
    1. Hage JJ, Bloem JJAM, Suliman HM. Review of the literature on techniques for phalloplasty with emphasis on the applicability in female-to-male transsexuals. The Journal of Urology. 1993;150(4):1093–1098. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources