Analysis of ureteral stent compression force and its role in malignant obstruction

Abstract

Purpose: Extrinsic ureteral obstruction can be a challenging entity for the urologist since half of the ureteral stents placed for malignant obstruction fail. We evaluated the resistance to radial compression of various stents.

Materials and methods: Silhouette(R) 4.6Fr, 6Fr and 8Fr, Sof-Curl Tecoflex 6Fr, Resonance 6Fr, Polaris Ultra 6Fr and 7Fr, and Percuflex 6Fr and 8Fr stents were tested. The force needed to compress the stent to 50% of its original external diameter was measured at 3 locations along the stent length, including proximal, middle and distal. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results: Statistically greater force was required to compress the Resonance and Silhouette stents compared to all others tested. These results were maintained at all 3 locations along the stent. Only the Polaris 6Fr stent differed in resistance to compression along the stent length.

Conclusions: The significantly higher forces required to compress the Resonance and Silhouette stents may translate into improved success in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction.