Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults
- PMID: 19012113
- DOI: 10.1080/14992020802301142
Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults
Abstract
This paper summarizes twenty studies, published since 1989, that have measured experimentally the relationship between speech recognition in noise and some aspect of cognition, using statistical techniques such as correlation or factor analysis. The results demonstrate that there is a link, but it is secondary to the predictive effects of hearing loss, and it is somewhat mixed across study. No one cognitive test always gave a significant result, but measures of working memory (especially reading span) were mostly effective, whereas measures of general ability, such as IQ, were mostly ineffective. Some of the studies included aided listening, and two reported the benefits from aided listening: again mixed results were found, and in some circumstances cognition was a useful predictor of hearing-aid benefit.
Similar articles
-
How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):75-93. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495459. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Trends Amplif. 2013. PMID: 23945955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of the mandarin reading span test and confirmation of its relationship with speech perception in noise.Int J Audiol. 2024 Dec;63(12):1009-1018. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2305685. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Int J Audiol. 2024. PMID: 38270384
-
Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.Trends Hear. 2014 Nov 23;18:2331216514558688. doi: 10.1177/2331216514558688. Trends Hear. 2014. PMID: 25421088 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S105-S111. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1319079. Epub 2017 Apr 27. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 28449597
-
Individual differences in speech recognition ability: implications for hearing aid selection.Ear Hear. 1991 Dec;12(6 Suppl):100S-108S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199112001-00003. Ear Hear. 1991. PMID: 1794636 Review.
Cited by
-
Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking.Front Neurosci. 2015 Apr 20;9:124. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00124. eCollection 2015. Front Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25941466 Free PMC article.
-
Sensory-Cognitive Interactions in Older Adults.Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52S-61S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000303. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 27355770 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open-Set Phoneme Recognition Performance With Varied Temporal Cues in Younger and Older Cochlear Implant Users.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):1196-1211. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00299. Epub 2022 Feb 8. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35133853 Free PMC article.
-
How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):75-93. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495459. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Trends Amplif. 2013. PMID: 23945955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.J Clin Med. 2020 May 8;9(5):1381. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051381. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32397101 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical