Second-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members
- PMID: 19014796
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.011
Second-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members
Abstract
Background: The objective of this analysis was to assess the second-trimester surgical abortion practices of National Abortion Federation (NAF) members in North America and Australia.
Study design: In 2002, questionnaires were mailed to 364 active member clinics of NAF for completion by their clinic administrators and individual providers.
Results: Two hundred eighty-nine (79%) clinics responded. Most NAF clinics (72%) offer second-trimester abortion services. The majority of second-trimester providers are obstetrician/gynecologists (63%), male (62%) and at least 50 years old (63%). We describe second-trimester surgical abortion practices in terms of patient eligibility, cervical ripening, ultrasound use, anesthesia and postoperative care.
Conclusions: Surgical techniques and postoperative practices for second-trimester abortions are similar among these respondents, suggesting that NAF's efforts to promulgate best practices using evidence-based guidelines are succeeding. The aging of skilled practitioners raises concerns about the future availability of second-trimester abortion.
Similar articles
-
First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members.Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 11. Contraception. 2009. PMID: 19341852
-
Administrative, counseling and medical practices in National Abortion Federation facilities.Fam Plann Perspect. 1982 Sep-Oct;14(5):257-62. Fam Plann Perspect. 1982. PMID: 6926971
-
Medical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members in the United States.Contraception. 2008 Dec;78(6):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Sep 9. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 19014795
-
Second-trimester surgical abortion.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;52(2):179-87. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181a2b43a. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19407524 Review.
-
Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):347-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.016. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19318143 Review.
Cited by
-
First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186487. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29023594 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0178871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178871. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28746377 Free PMC article.
-
Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar 1;145(3):307-315. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005821. Epub 2025 Jan 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39746207
-
Leukocytosis during cervical preparation with osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation.SAGE Open Med. 2021 Jan 12;9:2050312120986731. doi: 10.1177/2050312120986731. eCollection 2021. SAGE Open Med. 2021. PMID: 33489232 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical considerations on methods used in abortions.Health Care Anal. 2015 Mar;23(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0232-1. Health Care Anal. 2015. PMID: 23076345
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical