Recovery profiles from dexmedetomidine as a general anesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery
- PMID: 19020132
- DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181887fcc
Recovery profiles from dexmedetomidine as a general anesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery
Abstract
Background: Dexmedetomidine induces less change in hemodynamic values during the extubation period. This drug may be useful in anesthetic management requiring smooth emergence from anesthesia. We sought to determine the effects of co-administration of dexmedetomidine on the recovery profiles from sevoflurane and propofol, which usually provide safe and rapid recovery when administered alone.
Methods: Sixty patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into four groups according to the anesthetic to be administered; namely, sevoflurane (group S), propofol (group P), both sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine (group SD), or propofol and dexmedetomidine (group PD) as maintenance general anesthetics. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (0.6%-1.5%) in group S, propofol (2-5 mg/kg/h) in group P, sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg over 10 min followed by 0.4 microg/kg/h until the end of surgery) in group SD, and propofol and dexmedetomidine in group PD with continuous epidural infusion. Bispectral Index values were maintained within 45 +/- 5 by changing the concentration of sevoflurane or the infusion rate of propofol in all groups. The time between the interruption of maintenance general anesthetics and eye opening was measured. Postoperative cognitive function was evaluated using the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test.
Results: The time to eye opening of groups S (8.5 +/- 2.5 min, mean +/- SD; n = 15) and SD (12.0 +/- 3.3 min) were comparable, whereas that of group PD (21.7 +/- 7.1 min) was longer than that of group P (11.0 +/- 4.4 min). The time to eye opening of group PD was significantly (P < 0.001) longer than those of the other three groups. The scores of Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test between groups S and P were similar and were not changed by co-administration of dexmedetomidine.
Conclusion: When co-administered with dexmedetomidine, sevoflurane produced a shorter time to eye opening than propofol. Postoperative cognitive function was not affected by dexmedetomidine administration. These results suggest dexmedetomidine may delay recovery when given as an adjuvant to propofol during total i.v. anesthesia.
Similar articles
-
A comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):567-71. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac1265. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19608833 Clinical Trial.
-
Propofol/dexmedetomidine and propofol/ketamine combinations for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a prospective randomized study.Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.010. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20435239 Clinical Trial.
-
Open-label, prospective, randomized comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.008. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18343254 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Dexmedetomidine in children undergoing general anaesthesia with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis and systematic review.J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520927530. doi: 10.1177/0300060520927530. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32583698 Free PMC article.
-
Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):504-8. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245275.76916.87. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006. PMID: 16960482 Review.
Cited by
-
Combined effects of HCRTR1/2 gene variants and non-genetic factors on sleep-wake transition and hemodynamic stability during propofol, dexmedetomidine, and remifentanil anesthesia.Pharmacol Rep. 2025 Aug;77(4):1050-1062. doi: 10.1007/s43440-025-00740-7. Epub 2025 May 29. Pharmacol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40439868
-
Effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as propofol adjuvants on intra-operative hemodynamics and recovery profiles in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized comparative study.Avicenna J Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;5(3):67-73. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.160231. Avicenna J Med. 2015. PMID: 26229757 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Propofol Requirement in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):1040-1045. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_107_17. Anesth Essays Res. 2017. PMID: 29284872 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of dexmedetomidine bolus dose on isoflurane consumption in surgical patients under general anesthesia.Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):649-654. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.191122. Anesth Essays Res. 2016. PMID: 27746567 Free PMC article.
-
Dexmedetomidine in Attenuation of Haemodynamic Response and Dose Sparing Effect on Opioid and Anaesthetic Agents in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Randomized Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):UC01-UC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21501.8815. Epub 2016 Nov 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 28050479 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources