Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization

Abstract

Background: Here we report the short- and long-term results of a minimally invasive hybrid approach in 117 patients.

Methods: From 1996 to 2007, revascularization of the left anterior descending artery was performed in 1,696 patients by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), in 89 patients by beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) and in 30 patients by arrested-heart TECAB. Of these patients, 117 were scheduled for a hybrid procedure. Revascularization of the left anterior descending artery was performed by either MIDCAB (107 patients), beating-heart TECAB (8 patients) or arrested-heart TECAB (2 patients). Percutaneous coronary intervention of vessels other than the left anterior descending artery was performed 4 to 6 weeks preoperatively (53 cases), intraoperatively (5 cases), or 2 to 45 days postoperatively (59 cases). Demographic data, perioperative outcome, and annual follow-up were obtained from all patients.

Results: Minimally invasive bypass and stenting could be completed in all patients. Two high-risk patients (1.9%) died postoperatively. Follow-up of all patients adds up to 208 patient-years. Eight patients died during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival was 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.5% to 98.4%) at 1 year and 84.8% (95% CI: 73.5% to 94.9%) at 5 years. Follow-up angiogram of symptomatic patients showed 1 bypass occlusion and 5 in-stent restenosis with need for reintervention. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (including reintervention) and angina was 85.5% (95% CI: 76.9% to 94.1%) at 1 year and 75.5% (95% CI: 62.7% to 87.3%) at 5 years.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive hybrid coronary revascularization is a safe approach with good long-term results. It should be performed in selected patients at centers with considerable experience in minimally invasive bypass surgery and requires close cooperation between cardiologists and surgeons.