Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar;467(3):651-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0617-5. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction?

Marcel Dudda et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction is one cause for femoroacetabular impingement of the hip. However, the asphericity often is underestimated on conventional radiographs. This study compares the presence of asphericity on conventional radiographs with its appearance on radial slices of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). We retrospectively reviewed 58 selected hips in 148 patients who underwent a surgical dislocation of the hip. To assess the circumference of the proximal femur, alpha angle and height of asphericity were measured in 14 positions using radial slices of MRA. The hips were assigned to one of four groups depending on the appearance of the head-neck junction on anteroposterior pelvic and lateral crosstable radiographs. Group I (n = 19) was circular on both planes, Group II (n = 19) was aspheric on the crosstable view, Group III (n = 4) was aspheric on the anteroposterior view, and Group IV (n = 13) was aspheric on both views. In all four groups, the highest alpha angle was found in the anterosuperior area of the head-neck junction. Even when conventional radiographs appeared normal, an increased alpha angle was present anterosuperiorly. Without the use of radial slices in MRA, the asphericity would be underestimated in these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 1A–B
(A) Anteroposterior pelvis view of a patient without radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement (Group I). (B) Lateral crosstable view of a patient without radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement (Group I).
Fig. 2A–B
Fig. 2A–B
(A) Anteroposterior pelvis view of a patient with radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement in both planes (Group IV). (B) Lateral crosstable view of a patient with radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement in both planes (Group IV).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Construction of the alpha angle as described by Nötzli et al. [18].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Magnetic resonance arthrogram slice of radial slices showing the measurement of the height of asphericity at an alpha angle of 43°.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic of the proximal femur showing the clockwise rotation of the MRI slices, in which measurements were taken.
Fig. 6A–H
Fig. 6A–H
(A) Example of a MRA radial slice at 3 o’clock position (posterior) at the femoral neck axis. (B) Example of a MRA radial slice at 2 o’clock position at the femoral neck axis. (C) Example of a MRA radial slice at 1 o’clock position at the femoral neck axis. (D) Example of a MRA radial slice at 12 o’clock position (superior) at the femoral neck axis. (E) Example of a MRA radial slice at 11 o’clock position at the femoral neck axis. (F) Example of a MRA radial slice at 10 o’clock position at the femoral neck axis. (G) Example of a MRA radial slice at 9 o’clock position (anterior) at the femoral neck axis. (H) Magnetic resonance arthrogram radial slice localizer.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Diagram showing the alpha angles in Group I that included hips with spherical contours on both the anteroposterior pelvis and lateral crosstable views. No signs of asphericity.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Diagram showing the height of the asphericity in Group I that included hips with spherical contours on both the anteroposterior pelvis and lateral crosstable views. No signs of asphericity.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Diagram showing the alpha angles in Group II that included hips with asphericity on the lateral crosstable view only.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Diagram showing the height of asphericity in Group II that included hips with asphericity on the lateral crosstable view only.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Diagram showing the alpha angles in Group III that had asphericity of the hip on the anteroposterior pelvis (eg, pistol grip deformity) and normal contour in the lateral crosstable view.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Diagram showing the height of asphericity in Group III that had asphericity of the hip on the anteroposterior pelvis (eg, pistol grip deformity) and normal contour in the lateral crosstable view.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Diagram showing alpha angles in Group IV that included hips with aspheric head-neck junction on both views.
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Diagram showing the height of asphericity in Group IV that included hips with aspheric head-neck junction on both views.

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15921872', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15921872/'}]}
    2. Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b7.15203'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15972923', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15972923/'}]}
    2. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180f60b53', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/blo.0b013e3180f60b53'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17589367', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17589367/'}]}
    2. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Otto RJ, Schoenecker PL. The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:115–121. - PubMed
    1. None
    2. Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed M, Ganz R. Crosstable lateral radiograph for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2001;11:37–41.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1302/0301-620X.83B8.11964', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11964'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11764423', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11764423/'}]}
    2. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–1124. - PubMed

Publication types