A longitudinal cost analysis of primary and team nursing
- PMID: 1902557
A longitudinal cost analysis of primary and team nursing
Abstract
Cost findings from a 4-year (1984-1989) externally funded, empirical study, comparing primary and team nursing on medical units in a tertiary care teaching hospital, demonstrates that primary nursing is less costly than team nursing. An average savings of 6.5% was realized for the duration of the study. Three factors are identified as being responsible for the difference on a cost per patient per day basis. Overall, cost analysis per DRG from primary nursing suggests cost differences related to high DRG volume and average length-of-stay. An administrative review of the study's implications highlights the relevancy of these findings in relationship to nurse retention and cost savings.
Similar articles
-
Primary nursing. The impact on nursing costs within DRGs.J Nurs Adm. 1986 Mar;16(3):9-11. J Nurs Adm. 1986. PMID: 3081696
-
Professional nurse staffing and primary care: a cost comparison.Mich Hosp. 1985 Feb;21(2):19-22. Mich Hosp. 1985. PMID: 10270403 No abstract available.
-
A summary of findings of a five-year comparison study of primary and team nursing.Nurs Res. 1991 Mar-Apr;40(2):113-7. Nurs Res. 1991. PMID: 2003070
-
Primary nursing: containing labor costs.OH. 1979 Jun;23(6):11-3, 19. OH. 1979. PMID: 10277951 No abstract available.
-
Nursing: a major hospital cost component.Health Serv Res. 1988 Feb;22(6):773-96. Health Serv Res. 1988. PMID: 3126163 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD007019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007019.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31012954 Free PMC article.