Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
- PMID: 19025651
- PMCID: PMC2613397
- DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-9-75
Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
Abstract
Background: Pharmacokinetic properties, dosing regimen, and potency at the site of action are among the factors that influence activity of a corticosteroid. The potency of a corticosteroid at the site of action is determined significantly by its affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor. Recent literature on topical corticosteroids reveals an increasing emphasis on comparative relative receptor affinity values as a key method of differentiating among various corticosteroid compounds, particularly with regard to clinical efficacy.
Methods: A response was formulated to: Valotis A, Högger P: Human receptor kinetics and lung tissue retention of the enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid fluticasone furoate. Respir Res 2007, 8:54.
Results: Relative receptor binding affinities, while often showing significant variability across different laboratories, are a valid parameter when a comparison of the pharmacological activity of various glucocorticoids at the site of action is desired. Unfortunately within this context, scientific literature including the article from Valotis and Högger, confuse differences in potency (concentration or dose necessary to achieve a certain effect) with differences in efficacy (a quantitative difference in the overall maximum effect, even if all the receptors are occupied). All glucocorticoids will show the same efficacy as long as the selected dose will occupy the same number of receptors.
Conclusion: While relative receptor affinities are useful for comparing in vitro potencies of corticosteroids, these data are not representative of physiologic conditions and should not be used as a basis for comparing the presumed effectiveness of compounds in a clinical situation.
References
-
- British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network British guideline on the management of asthma: a national clinical guideline. Revised edition. 2007. http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/c2/uploads/asthma_fullguideline2007.pdf
-
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. FullReport. 2007. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf
-
- American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology The Allergy Report. 2000. http://www.aaaai.org/ar/volume2.pdf
-
- Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberg P, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Demoly P, Durham SR, Fokkens W, Lockey R, Meltzer EO, Mullol J, Naclerio RM, Price D, Simons FER, Vignola AM, Warner JO. Requirements for medications commonly used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Allergy. 2003;58:192–197. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00054.x. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical