Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial
- PMID: 19027483
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61758-4
Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial
Abstract
Background: Two phase II trials in patients with previously-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer suggested that gefitinib was efficacious and less toxic than was chemotherapy. We compared gefitinib with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who had been pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
Methods: We undertook an open-label phase III study with recruitment between March 1, 2004, and Feb 17, 2006, at 149 centres in 24 countries. 1466 patients with pretreated (>/=one platinum-based regimen) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned with dynamic balancing to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day orally; n=733) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) intravenously in 1-h infusion every 3 weeks; n=733). The primary objective was to compare overall survival between the groups with co-primary analyses to assess non-inferiority in the overall per-protocol population and superiority in patients with high epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-gene-copy number in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00076388.
Findings: 1433 patients were analysed per protocol (723 in gefitinib group and 710 in docetaxel group). Non-inferiority of gefitinib compared with docetaxel was confirmed for overall survival (593 vs 576 events; hazard ratio [HR] 1.020, 96% CI 0.905-1.150, meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion; median survival 7.6 vs 8.0 months). Superiority of gefitinib in patients with high EGFR-gene-copy number (85 vs 89 patients) was not proven (72 vs 71 events; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p=0.62; median survival 8.4 vs 7.5 months). In the gefitinib group, the most common adverse events were rash or acne (360 [49%] vs 73 [10%]) and diarrhoea (255 [35%] vs 177 [25%]); whereas in the docetaxel group, neutropenia (35 [5%] vs 514 [74%]), asthenic disorders (182 [25%] vs 334 [47%]), and alopecia (23 [3%] vs 254 [36%]) were most common.
Interpretation: INTEREST established non-inferior survival of gefitinib compared with docetaxel, suggesting that gefitinib is a valid treatment for pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Comment in
-
Gefitinib or docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet. 2008 Nov 22;372(9652):1785-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61741-9. Lancet. 2008. PMID: 19027472 No abstract available.
-
Gefitinib plus docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet. 2009 Feb 14;373(9663):541; author reply 542. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60193-8. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19217979 No abstract available.
-
Gefitinib plus docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet. 2009 Feb 14;373(9663):541-2; author reply 542. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60194-X. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19217980 No abstract available.
-
Gefitinib plus docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet. 2009 Feb 14;373(9663):541; author reply 542. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60192-6. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19217981 No abstract available.
-
I am no one. No one is perfect...Therefore I am perfect.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):e128-9; author reply e130-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8049. Epub 2009 Aug 31. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19720902 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous