Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Mar;5(2):249-55.
doi: 10.1007/BF01095966.

Distal renal tubular acidosis: the value of urinary pH, PCO2 and NH4+ measurements

Affiliations
Review

Distal renal tubular acidosis: the value of urinary pH, PCO2 and NH4+ measurements

O Wrong. Pediatr Nephrol. 1991 Mar.

Abstract

Distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) is not a single disease. The experimental forms of the syndrome are unsatisfactory as models of the naturally occurring disease, not least because they are seldom complicated by nephrocalcinosis, which is present in the majority of patients with spontaneous disease and contributes to the renal tubular defects found in the syndrome. Impairment of minimal urine pH, reduced urine carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) during passage of alkaline urine, and reduced urinary ammonium (NH4+) excretion, have all been advocated as essential criteria for the diagnosis of dRTA. Minimal urine pH, measured during metabolic acidosis, sulphate infusion, or after oral frusemide, is the yardstick against which other criteria should be assessed. A reduced urinary PCO2 is commonly found in dRTA but is not specific for the syndrome and may be accounted for by tubular defects other than those involving reduced distal hydrogen ion secretion. NH4+ excretion is reduced in most patients with renal acidosis whatever the nature of the underlying renal disease; this function is closely related to nephron mass, and is not specifically impaired in renal tubular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Med. 1968 Jul;45(1):32-42 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Med. 1986;37:319-31 - PubMed
    1. Q J Med. 1950 Oct;19(76):277-83 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990 Oct;50(6):627-33 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1981 Dec;241(6):F659-68 - PubMed