Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;18(1):52-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0834-3. Epub 2008 Nov 27.

Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle

Hitesh N Modi  1 , Ting Chen, Seung Woo Suh, Satyen Mehta, S Srinivasalu, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Hae-Ryong Song
Affiliations

Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle

Hitesh N Modi et al. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

It is a measurement of Cobb's angles between adolescent (AIS) and juvenile (JIS) idiopathic scoliosis who had stable curves (variation <5 degrees) in more than three visits. Main objective of this paper is to measure inter- and intra-observer reliability of measurements between AIS and JIS who had stable curves in regular follow-up. Twenty-nine JIS and 44 AIS patients who had stable curves without bracing were identified using PACS system. Two observers independently measured Cobb's angle twice on first, during follow-up and final radiogram using computer-based digital radiogram. Both observers were given pre-decided level of upper and lower end plates. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the measurement was calculated using Pearson correlation-coefficient test between JIS and AIS group. There was no significant difference in Cobb's angle in all measurements by both observers either in JIS (p = 0.756, range 0.706-0.815; ANOVA) or AIS (p = 0.871, range 0.795-0.929; ANOVA) group which suggested that there is no significant difference in Cobb's angle in repeated measurements. Intra-observer reliability for JIS (r = 0.600, range 0.521-0.751; Pearson test) was less than AIS (r = 0.969, range 0.943-0.984; Pearson test); and similarly, inter-observer reliability for JIS (r = 0.547, Pearson test) was also less than AIS (r = 0.961, Pearson test) which indicates that Cobb's angle measurement is less reliable in patients who have juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Using the identical condition for measurements in both the groups, we could find only one reason for less reliability in JIS group and that is poor demarcation of the vertebral end-plates in this group. This poor inter- and intra-observer reliability in JIS due to ill-defined endplates can be reduced by measuring all previous curves along with latest curves at the same time during the follow-up of patients with JIS to decide about the progression of curves and treatment options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Measurement of Cobb’s angle in Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis is scattered and less reliable
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurement of Cobb’s angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is uniform and more reliable
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Poorly demarcated end plates in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis which causes inter- and intra-observer reliability less than (b) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis which has well-demarcated end plates
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2563775', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2563775/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16822918', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16822918/'}]}
    2. Bansal GJ (2006) Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging. Postgrad Med J 82:425–428. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448 - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1194304', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1194304/'}]}
    2. Brooks HL, Azen SP, Gerberg E, Brooks R, Chan L (1975) Scoliosis: a prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:968–972 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/00007632-198405000-00010', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198405000-00010'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '6382634', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6382634/'}]}
    2. Brown JC, Axelgaard J, Howson DC (1984) Multicenter trial of a noninvasive stimulation method for idiopathic scoliosis: a summary of early treatment results. Spine 9:382–387. doi:10.1097/00007632-198405000-00010 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '2312528', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2312528/'}]}
    2. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs: intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:328–333 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s00586-001-0381-7', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-001-0381-7'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12522710', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12522710/'}]}
    2. Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG et al (2002) The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J 11:535–542. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0381-7 - PubMed