Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Nov 27:7:61.
doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-61.

A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks

Affiliations
Review

A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks

David J Briggs. Environ Health. .

Abstract

Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature - complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy. Integrated environmental health impact assessment is defined as a means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interventions that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexities, interdependencies and uncertainties of the real world. As such, it depends heavily on how issues are selected and framed, and implies the involvement of stakeholders both in issue-framing and design of the assessment, and to help interpret and evaluate the results. It is also a comparative process, which involves evaluating and comparing different scenarios. It consequently requires the ability to model the way in which the influences of exogenous factors, such as policies or other interventions, feed through the environment to affect health. Major challenges thus arise. Chief amongst these are the difficulties in ensuring effective stakeholder participation, in dealing with the multicausal and non-linear nature of many of the relationships between environment and health, and in taking account of adaptive and behavioural changes that characterise the systems concerned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Integrated environmental health impact assessment in relation to other forms of risk and impact assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An operational framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment.

References

    1. McMichael AJ. Planetary overload Global environmental change and the health of the human species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
    1. OECD Emerging systemic risks Final report to the OECD Futures Project Paris. 2000.
    1. Renn O, Klinke A. Systemic risks as challenge for policy making in risk governance. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2006;7 http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-06/06-1-33-e.htm
    1. Renn O. White Paper on risk governance: towards an integrative approach. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council; 2005.
    1. van Erp AMM, O'Keefe R, Cohen AJ, Warren J. Evaluating the effectiveness of air quality interventions. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 71:583–587. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms