Comparison of operative versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in the elderly

Abstract

To compare techniques of gastrostomy in elderly patients, the records of 100 patients age 70 and older who underwent gastrostomy tube placement as a primary procedure were reviewed. Two separate unmatched groups of 50 patients each were identified: those that underwent operative gastrostomy tube (OGT) placement and those that underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG) placement. The groups were studied for demographic similarities and for differences in morbidity, mortality, and ease of feeding. Comparison showed that PEGs had a lower mortality (0%) and morbidity (10%) than did OGTs where mortality was 4 per cent and morbidity was 22 per cent. PEGs began feeding sooner (1.0 day vs. 2.8 days) than OGTs. In addition, almost 60 per cent of the PEG patients underwent complete upper endoscopy at the time of the PEG, which revealed pathology that either altered the type of tube placed or the eventual medical management. PEG offers a less morbid, safer, and easier to use method of gastrostomy tube placement than OGT in the majority of elderly patients.