European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1
- PMID: 19040546
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00623.x
European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1
Abstract
The current paper presents the first part of Chapter 6 of the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to manage women with abnormal cervical cytology. Throughout this article the Bethesda system is used for cervical cytology terminology, as the European guidelines have recommended that all systems should at least be translated into that terminology while cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is used for histological biopsies (Cytopathology 2007; 18:213-9). A woman with a high-grade cytological lesion, a repeated low-grade lesion or with an equivocal cytology result and a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) test should be referred for colposcopy. The role of the colposcopist is to identify the source of the abnormal cells and to make an informed decision as to whether or not any treatment is required. If a patient requires treatment the colposcopist will decide which is the most appropriate method of treatment for each individual woman. The colposcopist should also organize appropriate follow-up for each woman seen. Reflex testing for high-risk HPV types of women with atypical squamous cells (ASC) of undetermined significance with referral for colposcopy of women who test positive is a first option. Repeat cytology is a second possibility. Direct referral to a gynaecologist should be restricted to special circumstances. Follow-up of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is more difficult because currently there is no evidence to support any method of management as being optimal; repeat cytology and colposcopy are options, but HPV testing is not sufficiently selective, unless for older women. Women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) should be referred without triage. Women with glandular lesions require particular attention. In a subsequent issue of Cytopathology, the second part of Chapter 6 will be presented, with recommendations for management and treatment of histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia and guidance for follow-up of special cases such as women who are pregnant, postmenopausal or immunocompromised.
Comment in
-
Colposcopy carried out by experts in multidisciplinary teams provides the best results.Cytopathology. 2008 Dec;19(6):337-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00626.x. Cytopathology. 2008. PMID: 19040543 No abstract available.
-
Recommendations that could improve performance of colposcopy and cytology.Cytopathology. 2008 Dec;19(6):338-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00627.x. Cytopathology. 2008. PMID: 19040544 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.047. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16890545
-
The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Aug;127(8):950-8. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-950-TCVROH. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003. PMID: 12952506
-
High-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing: a marker for atypical glandular cells.Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Mar;34(3):235-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.20369. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006. PMID: 16470857
-
Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses.Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.117. Vaccine. 2006. PMID: 16950021 Review.
-
History of the use of HPV testing in cervical screening and in the management of abnormal cervical screening results.J Clin Virol. 2009 Jul;45 Suppl 1:S3-S12. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70002-2. J Clin Virol. 2009. PMID: 19651367 Review.
Cited by
-
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition--summary document.Ann Oncol. 2010 Mar;21(3):448-458. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp471. Ann Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20176693 Free PMC article.
-
hr-HPV testing in the follow-up of women with cytological abnormalities and negative colposcopy.Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;109(7):1766-74. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.519. Epub 2013 Sep 5. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 24008667 Free PMC article.
-
Cytology and human papillomavirus testing 6 to 12 months after ASCUS or LSIL cytology in organized screening to predict high-grade cervical neoplasia between screening rounds.J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jun;50(6):1927-35. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00265-12. Epub 2012 Apr 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22518869 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.Future Microbiol. 2011 Sep;6(9):1083-98. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.87. Future Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21958146 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Increase in viral load, viral integration, and gain of telomerase genes during uterine cervical carcinogenesis can be simultaneously assessed by the HPV 16/18 MLPA-assay.Am J Pathol. 2010 Oct;177(4):2022-33. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090901. Epub 2010 Sep 2. Am J Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20813962 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous