Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May-Jun;40(3):13.
doi: 10.1051/vetres:2008051. Epub 2008 Dec 2.

Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review

Affiliations
Review

Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review

Sarah J Cox et al. Vet Res. 2009 May-Jun.

Abstract

Changes to foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control policies since 2001 mean that emergency vaccination must be considered more readily as a control measure in the future. Since field application of vaccine for emergency use has only rarely been applied, the effectiveness of single dose administration, as a control measure in an outbreak situation, is poorly understood. In this review we consider all the available experimental data from studies utilizing either experimental or readily available, commercially produced vaccines, in order to assess their likely effectiveness as an additional means of controlling FMD transmission and spread in an emergency. Overall it is concluded that such vaccines offer an additional and valuable means of FMD control for both ruminants and pigs. They are able to reduce clinical disease, sub-clinical infection and excretion and onward transmission of virus. However, to be most effective, vaccination should be rapidly applied to give maximum opportunity for immunity to develop. We also identify areas for future research and emphasize the importance of vaccine efficacy studies in providing data for models that can help to predict the efficacy of differing FMD control strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aggarwal N., Zhang Z., Cox S., Statham R., Alexandersen S., Kitching R.P., Barnett P.V.. Experimental studies with foot-and-mouth disease virus, strain O, responsible for the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom. Vaccine. 2002;20:2508–2515. - PubMed
    1. Alexandersen S., Zhang Z., Donaldson A.I., Garland A.J.M.. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. J. Comp. Pathol. 2003;129:1–36. - PubMed
    1. Arnold M.E., Paton D.J., Ryan E., Cox S.J., Wilesmith J.W.. Modeling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2008;275:107–115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett P.V., Pullen L., Williams L., Doel T.R.. International bank for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine: assessment of Montanide ISA 25 and ISA 206, two commercially available oil adjuvants. Vaccine. 1996;14:1187–1198. - PubMed
    1. Barnett P.V., Cox S.J.. The role of small ruminants in the epidemiology and transmission of foot-and-mouth disease. Vet. J. 1999;158:6–13. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources