Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;130(1):95-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words

James D Miles  1 , Robert W Proctor
Affiliations

Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words

James D Miles et al. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan.

Abstract

In two experiments, we compared level of activation and temporal overlap accounts of compatibility effects in the Simon task by reducing the discriminability of spatial and non-spatial features of a target location word. Participants made keypress responses to the non-spatial or spatial feature of centrally presented location words. The discriminability of the spatial feature of the word (Experiment 1), or of both the spatial and non-spatial feature (Experiment 2), was manipulated. When the spatial feature of the word was task-irrelevant, lowering the discriminability of this feature reduced the compatibility effect. The compatibility effect was restored when the discriminability of both the task-relevant and task-irrelevant features were reduced together. Results provide further evidence for the temporal overlap account of compatibility effects. Furthermore, compatibility effects when the spatial information was task-relevant and those when the spatial information was task-irrelevant were moderately correlated with each other, suggesting a common underlying mechanism in both versions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response time (RT) and percent error (PE) with standard errors for compatible and incompatible trials in the Simon task in Experiments 1 and 2. The discriminability of the spatial information (word legibility) was either high or low.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot with regression lines for Z-scores of compatibility effects in the high-discrimination conditions of the SRC and Simon tasks in Experiment 1 (open circles, solid line) and Experiment 2 (filled circles, dotted line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Compatibility effects at each response time quartile for high (filled circles) and low (open circles) stimulus discriminability conditions in the Simon task in Experiments 1 and 2. Exp 1 = task-irrelevant feature discriminability manipulated, Exp 2 = task-irrelevant and task-relevant discriminability manipulated.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adam JJ. The additivity of stimulus–response compatibility with perceptual and motor factors in a visual choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica. 2000;105:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Bosbach S, Prinz W, Kerzel D. A Simon Effect With Stationary Moving Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance. 2004;30:39–55. - PubMed
    1. Brown TL, Roos-Gilbert L, Carr TH. Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995;21:1395–1411. - PubMed
    1. Christensen CA, Ford JM, Pfefferbaum A. The effect of stimulus-response incompatibility on P3 latency depends on the task but not on age. Biological Psychology. 1996;44:121–141. - PubMed
    1. De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E. Condition and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1994;20:731–750. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources