Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Apr;154(4):486-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

Use of a body proportionality index for growth assessment of preterm infants

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Use of a body proportionality index for growth assessment of preterm infants

Irene E Olsen et al. J Pediatr. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the utility of weight-for-length (defined as gm/cm(3), known as the "ponderal index") as a complementary measure of growth in infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Study design: This was a secondary analysis of infants (n=1214) of gestational age 26 to 29 weeks at birth, included in a registry database (1991-2003), who had growth data at birth and discharge. Weight-for-age and weight-for-length were categorized as small (<10th percentile), appropriate, or large (>90th percentile).

Results: Statistical agreement between the weight-for-age and weight-for-length measures was poor (kappa=0.02 at birth, 0.10 at discharge; Bowker test for symmetry, P< .0001). From birth to discharge, the percentage of small-for-age infants increased from 12% to 21%, the percentage of small-for-length infants decreased from 10% to 4%, the percentage of large-for-age infants remained similar (<1%), and the percentage of large-for-length infants increased from 5% to 17%. At discharge, 92% of the small-for-age infants were appropriate or large-for-length, and 19% of the appropriate-for-age infants were large-for-length.

Conclusions: Weight-for-age and weight-for-length are complementary measures. Weight-for-length or other measures of body proportionality should be considered for inclusion in routine growth monitoring of infants in the NICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Discharge weight growth status of infants who were small weight-for-age at birth (n=149)
formula image Small at Discharge (<10th percentile weight or length-for-age) formula image Appropriate at Discharge (10-90th percentile or length-for-age) formula image Large at Discharge (<10th percentile weight or length-for-age) Weight-for-gestational age (weight-for-age) and weight/length3 ratio-for-age (weight-for-length) based on Lubchenco fetal growth charts (Lubchenco Pediatrics 1966)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Discharge weight growth status of infants who were appropriate weight-for-age at birth (n=1062)
formula image Small at Discharge (<10th percentile weight or length-for-age) formula image Appropriate at Discharge (10-90th percentile or length-for-age) formula image Large at Discharge (<10th percentile weight or length-for-age) Weight-for-gestational age (weight-for-age) and weight/length3 ratio-for-age (weight-for-length) based on Lubchenco fetal growth charts (Lubchenco Pediatrics 1966)

Comment in

References

    1. Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–25. - PubMed
    1. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963;32:793–800. - PubMed
    1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–8. - PubMed
    1. Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riddle WR, Donlevy SC, Lafleur BJ, Rosenbloom ST, Shenai JP. Equations describing percentiles for birth weight, head circumference, and length of preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:556–61. - PubMed