Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 19050195
- PMCID: PMC2713758
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.758
Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Context: Use of generic drugs, which are bioequivalent to brand-name drugs, can help contain prescription drug spending. However, there is concern among patients and physicians that brand-name drugs may be clinically superior to generic drugs.
Objectives: To summarize clinical evidence comparing generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease and to assess the perspectives of editorialists on this issue.
Data sources: Systematic searches of peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from January 1984 to August 2008.
Study selection: Studies compared generic and brand-name cardiovascular drugs using clinical efficacy and safety end points. We separately identified editorials addressing generic substitution.
Data extraction: We extracted variables related to the study design, setting, participants, clinical end points, and funding. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed by Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scores, and a meta-analysis was performed to determine an aggregate effect size. For editorials, we categorized authors' positions on generic substitution as negative, positive, or neutral.
Results: We identified 47 articles covering 9 subclasses of cardiovascular medications, of which 38 (81%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Clinical equivalence was noted in 7 of 7 RCTs (100%) of beta-blockers, 10 of 11 RCTs (91%) of diuretics, 5 of 7 RCTs (71%) of calcium channel blockers, 3 of 3 RCTs (100%) of antiplatelet agents, 2 of 2 RCTs (100%) of statins, 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of alpha-blockers. Among narrow therapeutic index drugs, clinical equivalence was reported in 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of class 1 antiarrhythmic agents and 5 of 5 RCTs (100%) of warfarin. Aggregate effect size (n = 837) was -0.03 (95% confidence interval, -0.15 to 0.08), indicating no evidence of superiority of brand-name to generic drugs. Among 43 editorials, 23 (53%) expressed a negative view of generic drug substitution.
Conclusions: Whereas evidence does not support the notion that brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease are superior to generic drugs, a substantial number of editorials counsel against the interchangeability of generic drugs.
Figures
Comment in
-
Equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs for cardiovascular disease.JAMA. 2009 Apr 22;301(16):1654-5; author reply 1655-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.521. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19383949 No abstract available.
-
Equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs for cardiovascular disease.JAMA. 2009 Apr 22;301(16):1654; author reply 1655-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.520. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19383950 No abstract available.
-
Equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs for cardiovascular disease.JAMA. 2009 Apr 22;301(16):1655; author reply 1655-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.522. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19383951 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: Brand-name drugs are not more effective than generic versions for treating cardiovascular disease.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):JC4-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-02006. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19391215 No abstract available.
-
Review: brand-name drugs are not more effective than generic versions for treating cardiovascular disease.Evid Based Med. 2009 Jun;14(3):81. doi: 10.1136/ebm.14.3.81. Evid Based Med. 2009. PMID: 19483030 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fischer MA, Avorn J. Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(4):207–214. - PubMed
-
- Shrank W, Hoang T, Ettner S, et al. The implications of choice. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(3):332–337. - PubMed
-
- Kesselheim AS, Fischer M, Avorn J. Extensions of intellectual property rights and delayed adoption of generic drugs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(6):1637–1647. - PubMed
-
- Fischer MA, Avorn J. Economic implications of evidence-based prescribing for hypertension. JAMA. 2004;291(15):1850–1856. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
