Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Dec 3;300(21):2514-26.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.758.

Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aaron S Kesselheim et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: Use of generic drugs, which are bioequivalent to brand-name drugs, can help contain prescription drug spending. However, there is concern among patients and physicians that brand-name drugs may be clinically superior to generic drugs.

Objectives: To summarize clinical evidence comparing generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease and to assess the perspectives of editorialists on this issue.

Data sources: Systematic searches of peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from January 1984 to August 2008.

Study selection: Studies compared generic and brand-name cardiovascular drugs using clinical efficacy and safety end points. We separately identified editorials addressing generic substitution.

Data extraction: We extracted variables related to the study design, setting, participants, clinical end points, and funding. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed by Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scores, and a meta-analysis was performed to determine an aggregate effect size. For editorials, we categorized authors' positions on generic substitution as negative, positive, or neutral.

Results: We identified 47 articles covering 9 subclasses of cardiovascular medications, of which 38 (81%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Clinical equivalence was noted in 7 of 7 RCTs (100%) of beta-blockers, 10 of 11 RCTs (91%) of diuretics, 5 of 7 RCTs (71%) of calcium channel blockers, 3 of 3 RCTs (100%) of antiplatelet agents, 2 of 2 RCTs (100%) of statins, 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of alpha-blockers. Among narrow therapeutic index drugs, clinical equivalence was reported in 1 of 1 RCT (100%) of class 1 antiarrhythmic agents and 5 of 5 RCTs (100%) of warfarin. Aggregate effect size (n = 837) was -0.03 (95% confidence interval, -0.15 to 0.08), indicating no evidence of superiority of brand-name to generic drugs. Among 43 editorials, 23 (53%) expressed a negative view of generic drug substitution.

Conclusions: Whereas evidence does not support the notion that brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease are superior to generic drugs, a substantial number of editorials counsel against the interchangeability of generic drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Selection NTI indicates narrow therapeutic index; WTI, wide therapeutic index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Drug Class and Aggregate Meta-analyses of Trials Comparing Generic and Brand-Name Drugs Used in Cardiovascular Disease ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme; CI, confidence interval.

Comment in

References

    1. Fischer MA, Avorn J. Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(4):207–214. - PubMed
    1. Shrank W, Hoang T, Ettner S, et al. The implications of choice. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(3):332–337. - PubMed
    1. Goldman DP, Joyce GF, Zheng Y. Prescription drug cost sharing. JAMA. 2007;298(1):61–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kesselheim AS, Fischer M, Avorn J. Extensions of intellectual property rights and delayed adoption of generic drugs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(6):1637–1647. - PubMed
    1. Fischer MA, Avorn J. Economic implications of evidence-based prescribing for hypertension. JAMA. 2004;291(15):1850–1856. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms