Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jan;11(1):74-80.
doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.19. Epub 2008 Dec 1.

Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging

Affiliations
Review

Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging

Nigel Borley et al. Asian J Androl. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Prostate cancer represents an increasing health burden. The past 20 years, with the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), has seen prostate cancer move increasingly from a condition that presented with locally advanced disease or metastases to one that is found upon screening. More is also known about the pathology of pre-malignant lesions. Diagnosis relies on trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) to obtain biopsies from throughout the prostate, but TRUS is not useful for staging. Imaging for staging, such as magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, still has a low accuracy compared with pathological specimens. Current techniques are also inaccurate in identifying lymph node and bony metastases. Nomograms have been developed from the PSA, Gleason score and clinical grading to help quantify the risk of extra-capsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens. Improved clinical staging modalities are required for more reliable prediction of pathological stage and for monitoring of response to treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jewett HJ. Significance of the palpable prostatic nodule. J Am Med Assoc. 1956;160:8389. - PubMed
    1. Stone NN, DeAntoni EP, Crawford ED. Screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen: results of prostate cancer awareness week, 19891992. Urology. 1994;44:18–25.
    1. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology. 1995;45:70–4. - PubMed
    1. Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:289–94. - PubMed
    1. Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GM, Chu TM. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Invest Urol. 1979;17:159–63. - PubMed

Substances