Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;26(5):489-94.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00837.x. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension

Affiliations

Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension

Navin Rajagopalan et al. Echocardiography. 2009 May.

Abstract

Background: Determination of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with suspected or known pulmonary hypertension (PH) requires right heart catheterization. Our purpose was to use Doppler echocardiography to estimate PVR in patients with PH.

Methods: Patient population consisted of 52 patients (53 +/- 12 years; 35 females) who underwent Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization within 24 hours of each other. The ratio of peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and right ventricular outflow time-velocity integral (VTI(RVOT)) was measured via transthoracic echocardiography and correlated to invasively determined PVR. A linear regression equation was generated to determine PVR by echocardiography based upon the TRV/VTI(RVOT) ratio. PVR by echocardiography was compared to invasive PVR using Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Significant correlation was demonstrated between TRV/VTI(RVOT) and PVR by catheterization (r = 0.73; P < 0.001). However, Bland-Altman analysis showed that agreement between PVR determined by echocardiography and invasive PVR was poor (bias = 0; standard deviation = 4.3 Wood units). In a subset of patients with invasive PVR < 8 Wood units (26 patients), correlation between TRV/VTI(RVOT) and invasive PVR was strong (r = 0.94; P < 0.001). In these patients, agreement between PVR by echocardiography and invasive PVR was satisfactory (bias = 0; standard deviation = 0.5 Wood units). There was no correlation between TRV/VTI(RVOT) and invasive PVR in patients with PVR > 8 Wood units (n = 26; r = 0.17).

Conclusion: While TRV/VTI(RVOT) correlates significantly with PVR, using it to estimate PVR in a PH patient population cannot be recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources