Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 19058842
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X
Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Because of the debate about whether second-generation antipsychotic drugs are better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs, we did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to compare the effects of these two types of drugs in patients with schizophrenia.
Methods: We compared nine second-generation antipsychotic drugs with first-generation drugs for overall efficacy (main outcome), positive, negative and depressive symptoms, relapse, quality of life, extrapyramidal side-effects, weight gain, and sedation.
Findings: We included 150 double-blind, mostly short-term, studies, with 21 533 participants. We excluded open studies because they systematically favoured second-generation drugs. Four of these drugs were better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs for overall efficacy, with small to medium effect sizes (amisulpride -0.31 [95% CI -0.44 to -0.19, p<0.0001], clozapine -0.52 [-0.75 to -0.29, p<0.0001], olanzapine -0.28 [-0.38 to -0.18, p<0.0001], and risperidone -0.13 [-0.22 to -0.05, p=0.002]). The other second-generation drugs were not more efficacious than the first-generation drugs, even for negative symptoms. Therefore efficacy on negative symptoms cannot be a core component of atypicality. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs induced fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than did haloperidol (even at low doses). Only a few have been shown to induce fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs. With the exception of aripiprazole and ziprasidone, second-generation antipsychotic drugs induced more weight gain, in various degrees, than did haloperidol but not than low-potency first-generation drugs. The second-generation drugs also differed in their sedating properties. We did not note any consistent effects of moderator variables, such as industry sponsorship, comparator dose, or prophylactic antiparkinsonian medication.
Interpretation: Second-generation antipsychotic drugs differ in many properties and are not a homogeneous class. This meta-analysis provides data for individualised treatment based on efficacy, side-effects, and cost.
Comment in
-
The spurious advance of antipsychotic drug therapy.Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):4-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61765-1. Epub 2008 Dec 6. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19058841 No abstract available.
-
Are new drugs for schizophrenia better than old ones?Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1248; author reply 1249-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60720-0. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19362667 No abstract available.
-
Are new drugs for schizophrenia better than old ones?Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1249; author reply 1249-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60721-2. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19362668 No abstract available.
-
Are new drugs for schizophrenia better than old ones?Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1249; author reply 1249-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60722-4. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19362669 No abstract available.
-
Neuropsychiatric disorders: The choice of antipsychotics in schizophrenia.Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 Jun;5(6):308-10. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.68. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19498434
-
Review: second generation antipsychotics are a heterogeneous drug class.Evid Based Ment Health. 2009 Aug;12(3):90. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.12.3.90. Evid Based Ment Health. 2009. PMID: 19633258 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical