Tricuspid incompetence and geometry of the right ventricle as predictors of right ventricular function after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
- PMID: 19059106
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.012
Tricuspid incompetence and geometry of the right ventricle as predictors of right ventricular function after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
Abstract
Background: Implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an established treatment for end-stage heart failure. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction develops in 20% to 50% of patients after LVAD implantation, leading to prolonged ICU stay and elevated mortality. However, the prediction of RV failure remains difficult.
Methods: The pre-operative echocardiographic parameters, tricuspid incompetence (TI), RV end-diastolic diameter (cut-off >35 mm), RV ejection fraction (cut-off <30%), right atrial dimension (cut-off >50 mm) and short/long axis ratio (cut-off >0.6), were analyzed retrospectively in 54 patients. Patients were divided into two groups. One group consisted of patients with RV failure (n = 9), as defined by the presence of two of the following criteria in the first 48 hours after surgery: mean arterial pressure < or =55 mm Hg; central venous pressure > or =16 mm Hg; mixed venous saturation < or =55%; cardiac index <liters/min/m(2); inotropic support score >20 units; or need for an RVAD. The other patients comprised the non-RV-failure group (n = 45).
Results: The RV failure group had a significantly higher short/long axis ratio of the RV (0.63 vs 0.52, p = 0.03; odds ratio 4.4, p = 0.011). For patients with a short/long axis ratio of the RV of <0.6, RV failure occurred in 7% of patients, as compared with 50% for patients with a ratio > or =0.6 (p = 0.013). Among patients with TI Grade III or IV, 75% developed RV failure as compared with 12% in patients with TI Grade I or II (p = 0.054). The odds ratio for RV failure after LVAD implantation for TI Grade III or IV was 4.7 (p = 0.012).
Conclusions: Pre-operative evaluation of tricuspid incompetence and RV geometry may help to select patients who would benefit from biventricular support.
Similar articles
-
Tricuspid annular motion as a predictor of severe right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Oct;27(10):1102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.07.022. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18926401
-
Load dependency of right ventricular performance is a major factor to be considered in decision making before ventricular assist device implantation.Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11 Suppl 1):S14-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000335. Circulation. 2013. PMID: 24030398
-
Evaluation of right ventricular function and post-operative findings using cardiac computed tomography in patients with left ventricular assist devices.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Aug;30(8):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 6. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011. PMID: 21530319
-
Left ventricular vs. biventricular mechanical support: Decision making and strategies for avoidance of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.103. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Int J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26232775 Review.
-
Preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;17(4):249-61. doi: 10.1177/1089253213488246. Epub 2013 May 2. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013. PMID: 23640105 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of right ventricular function in left ventricular assist device candidates.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(2):379-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001127. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24642920 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Ventricular assist devices: initial orientation.J Thorac Dis. 2013 Aug;5(4):567-71. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.12. J Thorac Dis. 2013. PMID: 23991317 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow biventricular assist devices.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May;10(3):311-328. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-cfmcs-34. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34159113 Free PMC article.
-
[Improvements in implantable mechanical circulatory support systems : literature overview and update].Herz. 2011 Oct;36(7):622-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3509-5. Herz. 2011. PMID: 21912911 Review. German.
-
Blood flow kinetic energy is a novel marker for right ventricular global systolic function in patients with left ventricular assist device therapy.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 16;10:1093576. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1093576. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37260947 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources