Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;18(9):1011-4.
doi: 10.1002/pon.1506.

Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment

Eric Huyghe  1 , Paul Martinetti, Dawen Sui, Leslie R Schover
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment

Eric Huyghe et al. Psychooncology. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted pilot studies of the feasibility and efficacy of an interactive, computerized educational tool, Banking on Fatherhood (BOF).

Methods: Two small randomized trials were conducted, with 20 male cancer patients eligible to bank sperm in Study 1 and 19 oncology fellows or residents in Study 2. In each trial, half of the subjects viewed BOF before completing questionnaires, and half viewed it afterward. Outcome measures included a knowledge test in both trials and a Decisional Conflict scale in the patient trial. All participants, plus a panel of 10 experts, ultimately viewed BOF and completed a form evaluating its usability and value.

Results: Patients who completed questionnaires after viewing BOF had significantly less decisional conflict about banking sperm than those who had not viewed it (P=0.0065), but knowledge scores were not significantly different between groups. Physicians who filled out questionnaires after viewing BOF scored significantly higher on the knowledge test (P<0.006). Patients, physicians and experts rated BOF as easy to use, informative and addressing important psychosocial concerns, with videos and animations adding to the value of the educational tool.

Conclusion: Pilot studies suggest that BOF is a feasible intervention that could enhance decisions about sperm banking. Research with larger groups is needed to validate its effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law Taskforce 7. Ethical considerations for the cryopreservation of gametes and reproductive tissues for self use. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:460–462. - PubMed
    1. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, Beck LN, Brennan LV, Oktay K. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–2931. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5888. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glaser AW, Phelan L, Crawshaw M, Jagdev S, Hale J. Fertility preservation in adolescent males with cancer in the United Kingdom: a survey of practice. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89 :736–737. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heath JA, Stern CJ. Fertility preservation in children newly diagnosed with cancer: existing standards of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust. 2006;185:538–541. - PubMed
    1. Neal MS, Nagel K, Duckworth J, Bissessar H, Fischer MA, Portwine C, Tozer R, Barr RD. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a regional experience. Cancer. 2007;110:125–1129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22889. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms